Epstein Secrets

s; (5) Sensitivity to the nature of the suit and the victims' interest in maintaining their privacy: (6) Experience litigating in federal court in the Southern District of Florida; ' Your letter refaitinces U.S. v Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund sealement I asked ow prosecutor

ty to review and raise objections to the terms of the Agreement Again, no one raised objections to the Section 2255 language. Since the signing of theAgreement, the defense team and our Office have addressed several Issues that have arisen under the Agreement. Although the exchanges were at times a bit liti

s; (5) Sensitivity to the nature of the suit and the victims' interest in maintaining their privacy: (6) Experience litigating in federal court in the Southern District of Florida; ' Your letter refaitinces U.S. v Boehm, No. 3:04CR00003 (D. Ala 2004) as a model for a restitution fund sealement I asked ow prosecutor

ity to review and rain objections to the terms of the Agreement Again, no one raised objections to the Section 2255 language. Since the signing of theAgreement, the defense team and our Office have addressed several Issues that have arisen under the Agreement. Although the exchanges were at times a bit liti

ll not contest the jurisdiction of the United States et eel EFTA00289815 12/04/07 TUE 16:46 pa 306 530 6440 EXECUTIVE OFFICE District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person andfor the subject matter,' and Epstein waives his right to contest liability and also waives iris right to contest dama

s, defense counsel suggested several similar arrangements, including a Trust !bad. Again, our decision not to ante a fund flows from our belief that theAgreement sbouldprovicie the same Taken) the victims as they would have been entitled had we proceeded to trial. A restitution land or trust fund would place