Epstein Secrets

INE THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Petitioners' Motion to Unseal Non- Prosecution Agreement between the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein. After consideration of the Motion end the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petitioners' Motion is GRANTE

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (li ' Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

G In accordance with Local Rules 4.6 of the Special Rules Governing the Admission and Practice of Attorneys of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the undersigned respectfully moves for the admission of Jay C. Howell for purposes of limited appearance as co-counsel on behalf of Jan

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11'h Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

tion of prostitution. He was also charged by information with procuring persons under 18 for prostitution. The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida began a federal grand jury investigation into allegations arising out of the same conduct. In September 2007, the United States Attorney

he first place, See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

ENT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Petitioners' Motion to Unseal Non- Prosecution Agreement between the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffrey Epstein. After consideration of the Motion and the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petitioners' Motion is GRANTE

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown'); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act

ENT THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the Petitioners' Motion to Unseal Non- Prosecution Agreement between the United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Florida and Jeffity Epstein. After consideration of the Motion and the record, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Petitioners' Motion is GRANTE

he first place. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) (allowing for entry of a protective order upon motion for a party "for good cause shown"); see also In re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, 820 F.2d 352, 356 (11th Cir. 1987) ("good cause" for a protective order "generally signifies a sound basis or legitimate need to take judicial act