Epstein Secrets

ve inside information due to its representation of one of Epstein's alleged victims in a civil case styled Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, pending in the Southern District of Florida. Representatives of D3 were offered "the opportunity" to invest in a pre-suit Jeffrey Epstein. R. 810, citing pleadings in LM v.

rm, which enhanced the credibility of the purported investment opportunity; (d) Rothstein and other co-conspirators utilized funds obtained through the Ponzi Scheme to supplement and support the operation and activities of RRA, to expand RRA by the hiring of additional attorneys and support staff, to fund sala

--ritiec)a ° P" 4 I et fase 10-02612-RBR Doc 148-1 Filed 12/14/10 Page 1 of 10 ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on 1.2 - /4 -10 Raymond B. Ray, Judge United States Bankruptcy Court UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FOR

tody. [D.E. 106 at '68-69]. At Rothstein's sentencing, Judge James I. Cohn made several findings regarding the role that RRA played in facilitating the Ponzi Scheme. In particular he noted that Millis case is about the selling of fake financial products. The marketing, however, was anything but simple. It was so

ed Complaint in Razorback 1 The following facts are well documented by media reports, criminal case files from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, civil case filings from the Florida circuit courts and the pleadings and discovery in the instant case. 2 Although Epstein's subjective

time that Rothstein had been disbarred and the Florida Bar had begun actively investigating dozens of attorneys employed by RRA in connection with the Ponzi Scheme. [Cite Epstein Affidavit]; Miami Herald, Scott Rothstein Scandal: Scott Rothstein Partners Probed (January 14, 2010)("The Florida Bar is investigati