Epstein Secrets

the sieve before jury selection or during the trial. MR. McCRAW: Yes, I couldn't agree with you more, your Honor. I would, of course, point to, in the Southern District, that we have had, over of the course of my career, much higher profile cases than Mr. Tartaglione's and found a jury and had those upheld as fair

let me start us off on Tartaglione because I may be able to zero in on what is of particular concern. I could not follow, although I've read both Capone declarations, including the first one — which, starting around paragraph 28, engages with Tartaglione — I couldn't think up, except with some degr

uld not implicate the entire document, right? MR. : With the exception that I think some of these documents — and I believe this is noted in the Capone declaration — there are concerns about even releasing them in part because I think the idea, first, in the Tartaglione case that there would be do

the sieve before jury selection or during the trial. MR. McCRAW: Yes, I couldn't agree with you more, your Honor. I would, of course, point to, in the Southern District, that we have had, over of the course of my career, much higher profile cases than Mr. Tartaglione's and found a jury and had those upheld as fair

let me start us off on Tartaglione because I may be able to zero in on what is of particular concern. I could not follow, although I've read both Capone declarations, including the first one — which, starting around paragraph 28, engages with Tartaglione — I couldn't think up, except with some degr

implicate the entire document, right? MR. KOCHEVAR: With the exception that I think some of these documents — and I believe this is noted in the Capone declaration — there are concerns about even releasing them in part because I think the idea, first, in the Tartaglione case that there would be do

ed interference with the pending criminal cases through the declarations of a supervising prosecutor within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff's opposition fails to meaningfully engage with the substance of these declarations, and instead relies on speculation about h

isclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The Capone and Supplemental Capone Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tartaglione prosecution, wherein the G

ed interference with the pending criminal cases through the declarations of a supervising prosecutor within the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York. Plaintiff's opposition fails to meaningfully engage with the substance of these declarations, and instead relies on speculation about h

isclosure of the Records Would Interfere with Pending Criminal Proceedings BOP properly withheld the Tartaglione Records' under Exemption 7(A). The Capone and Supplemental Capone Declarations explain why release of the Tartaglione Records would interfere with the Tartaglione prosecution, wherein the G