Epstein Secrets

eless, the Government will also provide a non-exhaustive list of U.S.-based issuing banks to the defendants, including Issuing Banks located within the Southern District of New York.° D. Other Evidentiary Detail Finally, Akhavan and Weigand seek an order compelling the Government to set forth a multitude of details

]he identities of the United States banks and other financial institutions that `offer[ed] payment processing services directly to merchants,"' and Ville identities of the United States banks and other financial institutions that used Independent Sales Organizations or other third parties to process p

of any certain set of facts, other than whether a charging document was ever filed against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. And while this Office remains willing to cooperate, cooperation does not mean agreeing to facts that are not relevant to the resolution

tification letter. The notification promises that the Justice Department would make its "best efforts" to protect Jane Doe No. 1's rights, including Ville reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the United States in the case" and "to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the distric

of any certain set of facts, other than whether a charging document was ever filed against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. And while this Office remains willing to cooperate, cooperation does not mean agreeing to facts that are not relevant to the resolution

tification letter. The notification promises that the Justice Department would make its "best efforts" to protect Jane Doe No. 1's rights, including Ville reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the United States in the case" and "to be reasonably heard at any public proceeding in the distric

w, the motions should be denied in their entirety. First, the non-prosecution agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida is entirely irrelevant to this case, and the defendant's motion fails as a matter of law. Second, the indictment is timely under 18 U.S.C

med in the proposed agreement, because the USAO was not interested in prosecuting those individuals if Epstein entered a plea. Villafana told OPR, [Ville considered Epstein to be the top of the food chain, and we wouldn't have been interested in prosecuting anyone else.' She did not consider the possi