Epstein Secrets

Page 1 of 1 Match 20, 2011 To whom it may cencetu: I served u s U.S. Attaney for the Southern District of Florida from 2005 through 2009. Over S past weeks. L have read much toga:ding Mr. balmy Epsteto. Some appears Imo. some appears distorts. I :bou

Epstein attorney Roy Black denies allegations In letter by ex-U.S. Attorney ~Gander Acosta jpegåreni ems I ado Au.* aye I Anna/ per 2 ATM( Appal 069. 3 Ai Nlii I na awna niacin biX4 ;Kam° yasinelsoiiie many e: Mesa tar-ii illiPONAIMC1/4 iotopo Kano ymin petba)n on ding dare. limns Dnnt r

risdiction of this Court. This case is properly removable because it falls within the original jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) (establishing that federal district courts have original I C.M.A. v. Epstein et aL, Case No. 50 2008 CA 005

1 Il l Ariollegol Acts 1 593 00000 one Sighilluelies Aci 1 193 EavInsommial Menem 1 194 gamy Allocelloa Am -8 69) treidom of Memnon Aci 1 900 Appal oh mt m Dose esamo Jade Engel Acmes to !nun , 00 Coestimnsaolge of Sun Sumo PROP HOSTS 1 120 COPYrIlhis I ISO P tttt 1 940 Trammel LABOR

ation of 18 U.S.C. § 2422, as well as wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The Defendant committed these crimes within the jurisdiction of the Southern District of Florida in Palm Beach County, Florida. 2. Upon information and belief, the Defendant is the subject of a federal criminal investigation conduct

ted Stouts of Properiy 21 USC III 3 630 Limior Laws 3 640 R.R. A Tenet 7 630 Airline Rea. 3 MO Uncopitiiamil Safely/1144M 3 690 Oita 1 422 Appal 211 USC 1511 74:3 Wklidemsal 25 USC 157 7 490 Sis e RappeeMneafill 7 III) Mavis/ 7 430 Br Ls so6 limiting 7 430 Commove 3 440 Dammam'. n 47