Epstein Secrets

d victims relevant to Count One of the instant Indictment. In the fall of 2007, the Defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the Southern District of Florida in connection with the conduct at issue in that investigation, which the non-prosecution agreement identified as including investigations

ernment's motion for remand (detention) is granted and the Defense motion for pretrial release is denied. Dated: New York, New York July 18, 2019 RICHARD M. BERMAN, U.S.D.J. 33 EFTA00039415

New York Field Office 26 Federal Plaza, 23'd Floor New York, New York 10278 Dear Assistant Director Sweeney: I received the enclosed letter from the Southern District of New York's Clerks Office. as I had presided over the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein, 19 Cr 490 in 2019. The letter is addressed to F.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CHAMBERS OF RICHARD M. BERMAN UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 40 CENTRE STREET NEW YORK. NEW YORK 10007 OFFICIAL BUSINESS X-RAYED FIVE POINTS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY STATE ROUTE 96,

d victims relevant to Count One of the instant Indictment. In the fall of 2007, the Defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the Southern District of Florida in connection with the conduct at issue in that investigation, which the non-prosecution agreement identified as including investigations

ernment's motion for remand (detention) is granted and the Defense motion for pretrial release is denied. Dated: New York, New York July 18, 2019 RICHARD M. BERMAN, U.S.D.J. 33 EFTA00074022

d victims relevant to Count One of the instant Indictment. In the fall of 2007, the Defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the Southern District of Florida in connection with the conduct at issue in that investigation, which the non-prosecution agreement identified as including investigations

ernment's motion for remand (detention) is granted and the Defense motion for pretrial release is denied. Dated: New York, New York July 18, 2019 RICHARD M. BERMAN, U.S.D.J. 33 EFTA00074061 Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB Document 32-1 Filed 07/18T19 Pagn 4: 7f . 4 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-11 Entered on F

5 J78repsc There is no evidence to support that. The investigation was begun and conducted entirely separate from any other district. It began in the Southern District of New York. Certainly there is evidence that was gathered that is consistent with and even overlapping with the prior investigation. But as the C

24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x x HON. RICHARD M. BERMAN APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorneys REID H. WEINGARTE

at the nonpros agreement was circumvented by the prosecutors in Florida when they encouraged their witnesses and their witnesses' lawyers to go to the Southern District and catalyze and create a case. That's unique. These were not two silos, the Southern District of Florida and the Southern District of New York. I

TED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x x 19 CR 490 (RMB) Conference New York, N.Y. July 15, 2019 10:05 a.m. HON. RICHARD M. BERMAN, District Judge APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorn

d victims relevant to Count One of the instant Indictment. In the fall of 2007, the Defendant entered into a non-prosecution agreement ("NPA") with the Southern District of Florida in connection with the conduct at issue in that investigation, which the non-prosecution agreement identified as including investigations

ernment's motion for remand (detention) is granted and the Defense motion for pretrial release is denied. Dated: New York, New York July 18, 2019 RICHARD M. BERMAN, U.S.D.J. 33 EFTA00081979

5 J78repsc There is no evidence to support that. The investigation was begun and conducted entirely separate from any other district. It began in the Southern District of New York. Certainly there is evidence that was gathered that is consistent with and even overlapping with the prior investigation. But as the C

24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x x HON. RICHARD M. BERMAN APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorneys REID H. WEINGARTE

5 J78repsc There is no evidence to support that. The investigation was begun and conducted entirely separate from any other district. It began in the Southern District of New York. Certainly there is evidence that was gathered that is consistent with and even overlapping with the prior investigation. But as the C

24 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x x HON. RICHARD M. BERMAN APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York Assistant United States Attorneys REID H. WEINGARTE

at the nonpros agreement was circumvented by the prosecutors in Florida when they encouraged their witnesses and their witnesses' lawyers to go to the Southern District and catalyze and create a case. That's unique. These were not two silos, the Southern District of Florida and the Southern District of New York. I

TED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. Before: x x 19 CR 490 (RMB) Conference New York, N.Y. July 15, 2019 10:05 a.m. HON. RICHARD M. BERMAN, District Judge APPEARANCES GEOFFREY S. BERMAN United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York BY: Assistant United States Attorn