Epstein Secrets

client L.M., filed a two hundred and thirty four (234) page, one hundred fifty-six (156) count complaint against Epstein in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida styled L.M. v Epstein, Case Number 09-CIV- 81092. However, Edwards was never served. The case was filed with a misspelling of Epstein's l

nd RRA attorneys regarding Epstein Litigation Strategy. b) On October 19, 2009, Edwards sent an email to Nurik on JEE [Epstein] Evidence. - 7 - FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLF.R DRIVE, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044 EFTA00584218 Epstein v Rot

for Edwards' clients with claims against Epstein, to the detriment of the Plaintiff. Defendants Rothstein, Edwards, and others, conspired to induce FOWLER WHITE BuRNEET P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE. WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044 EFTA00584212 Epstein v Roth

ified in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and the subject matter. Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are persons who, while minors, were victims

ese matters. He is well aware of the ramifications of his past behavior and, accordingly, there is no concern, whatsoever, that he will re-offend. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. EFTA00224653 Page 2 The following proposal is offered as an assurance to the community that the goals of appropriate punishme

d on the attached service list this 12th day of April, 2018. I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A). Is/ David P. Vita

CASE NO.: 09-34791-RBR CHAPTER 11 BRADLEY EDWARDS'S REPLY TO JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FOWLER WHITE AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANCTIONS AND COSTS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE R

e 3 of 23 I. From the 1990s through the 2000s, billionaire Jeffrey Epstein sexually abused dozens of then-minor girls in his Palm Beach mansion in the Southern District of Florida and elsewhere. Several of these victims, including L.M., E.W., and "Jane Doe," were represented by Farmer Jaffe attorney Bradley J. Edwa

ourts.&ov IN RE: ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A., Debtor. CASE NO.: 09-3479 I-RBR CHAPTER 11 MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF AN ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY FOWLER WHITE AND JEFFREY EPSTEIN SHOULD NOT BE HELD IN CONTEMPT OF COURT, TO PERMIT DISCOVERY, TO ASSESS SANCTIONS AND COSTS, AND FOR OTHER APPROPRIATE R

client L.M., filed a two hundred and thirty four (234) page, one hundred fifty-six (156) count complaint against Epstein in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida styled L.M. v Epstein, Case Number 09-CIV- 81092. However, Edwards was never served. The case was filed with a misspelling of Epstein's -

ed by RRA for Edwards' clients with claims against Epstein, to the detriment of the Plaintiff. Defendants Rothstein, Edwards, and others, conspired FOWLER WHITE BuRNEET P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POINT WEST, 777 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE. WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044 EFTA00584195 Epstein v Roth

n Dcrshowitz, Esq. December 7,2007 Page 6 I have reviewed the submissions made on behalf of Mr. Epstein to the United States Attorney's office in the Southern District of Florida, which concluded that the cited federal statutes are inapplicable to the allegations made against Mr. Epstein and therefore, as a matter

ls. Sincerely, EFTA01718518 T-1186 p °MAO F-STS Dec-07-6T 04: Om Fr am-Fail er-Whi te Burnett ei DATE: December 7, 2007 Name LAW OFFICES FOWLER WHITE 13URNETT IAMI, • LAMM 3 3 - 2 FAX TriANSMITICAL Faxeshe ex costa NUMBER OF PAGES: 3 (Excluding itansmitial page) FROM: Lilly Ann Sanch

ified in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and the subject matter. Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are persons who, while minors, were victims

ese matters. He is well aware of the ramifications of his past behavior and, accordingly, there is no concern, whatsoever, that he will re-offend. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. EFTA00225195 Page 2 The following proposal is offered as an assurance to the community that the goals of appropriate punishme

using the intemet, acted with a specific intent to persuade a means to engage in unlawful sex). In fact, we have reviewed every indictment filed in the Southern District of Florida in which there is at least one allegation of a violation of §2422(b). To the extent the facts could be discerned from the indictment, we

ese matters. He is well aware of the ramifications of his past behavior and, accordingly, there is no concern, whatsoever, that he will re-offend. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. RFP MIA 000053 EFTA00184661 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 361-48 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/10/2016 Page 3 of 4 • Page 2 Th

er attorney to represent you, that attorney can review the Court's order in the matter of In re Jane Does I and 2, United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Court File No. 08- 80736-C1V-MARRA. Please understand that neither the U.S. Attorney's Office nor the Federal Bureau of Investigation ca

15 Page 40 of Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 16048 Filed 04/08/11 Page 39 of 39 SERVICE LIST Christopher E. Knight, Esq. Joseph L. Ackerman, Esq. P.A. FOWLER WHITE ETJRNE'IT Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. A b Goldber er et al. Marc S. Nurik, Esq. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik Gary M. Farmer, Jr. Farmer,

ified in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and the subject matter. Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are persons who, while minors, were victims

ese matters. He is well aware of the ramifications of his past behavior and, accordingly, there is no concern, whatsoever, that he will re-offend. FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. Case No. 08-80736-CV-MARRA P-013391 EFTA00230296 Page 2 The following proposal is offered as an assurance to the community t