Epstein Secrets

ary. The United States Attorneys' office, at that juncture, was reviewing evidence relating to Epstein's sexual crimes against minor females within the Southern District of Florida and deliberating the filing of relevant federal charges; while Epstein's counsel clearly hoped to avoid any actual litigation between th

e District Court in similar circumstancesr I Exhibit B, at 35-36. Edwards supported this last statement with the following authorities: See, e.g., Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Republic of the Philippines, 951 F.2d 1414, 1429 (3d Cir. 1991) (Westinghouse's disclosure of work product materials to the Justice Department d

rsary. The United States Attorneys' office, at that juncture, was reviewing evidence relating to Epstein' sexual crimes against minor females within the Southern District of Florida and 6 EFTA00600059 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 7 of 11 deliberating the filing of rele

293 F.3d 289 (6th Cir. 2002), cert. dismissed, 539 U.S. 977 (2003); In re Quest Communications International, Inc., 450 F.3d 1179 (10'" Cir. 2006); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v Republic of Philippines, 951 F.2d 1414, 1428-31 (3d Cir. 1991); In re Subpoena Duces Tecum, 738 F.2d 1367, 1372 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Finally, the c

rsary. The United States Attorneys' office, at that juncture, was reviewing evidence relating to Epstein' sexual crimes against minor females within the Southern District of Florida and 6 EFTA00602812 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 7 of 11 deliberating the filing of rele

293 F.3d 289 (6ih Cir. 2002), cert. dismissed, 539 U.S. 977 (2003); In re Quest Communications International, Inc., 450 F.3d 1179 (10ih Cir. 2006); Westinghouse Electric Corp. v Republic of Philippines, 951 F.2d 1414, 1428-31 (3d Cir. 1991); In re Subpoena Duces Tecum, 738 F.2d 1367, 1372 (D.C. Cir. 1984). Finally, the c