Epstein Secrets

se. 3 understand that was recently reprimanded at a special hearing convened by a United States District Judge in the West Palm Beach Division of the Southern District of Florida, for making misrepresentations during a prior sentencing proceeding. In fact, Stephanie Thacker, a former deputy to CEOS Chief Drew Oost

actions is drippin with irony. We respectfully cull your attention to the transcript of the interview with and guide you -- as the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wit making Judgments consistent with our constitutional order — to the telling fact that Ms. Miler did not in any manner view herse

that you already have our May 19 and May 27 communications to the Deputy Attorney General, as well as our prior written submissions to CEOS and to the Southern District of Florida. In light of the significant volume of our prior submissions and to facilitate your review, we have drafted four supplemental submission

not be countenanced. That is all the more true under the circumstances where the duly appointed U.S. Attorney opined that, in effect, the "unitary" Executive Branch was driving this prosecution. We now know that is not so. What I respectfully request, and what I hope you will provide, is a truly "de novo" revie

Since no federal criminal charge was filed against Epstein, petitioners sought relief under the second clause, by filing their emergency petition in the Southern District of Florida on July 7, 2008. Petitioners were aware that Epstein had entered his plea of guilty in the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Florida, on

n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction." The Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case. United States Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974). "It follows,

Since no federal criminal charge was filed against Epstein, petitioners sought relief under the second clause, by filing their emergency petition in the Southern District of Florida on July 7, 2008. Petitioners were aware that Epstein had entered his plea of guilty in the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Florida, on

n]othing in this chapter shall be construed to impair the prosecutorial discretion of the Attorney General or any officer under his direction." The Executive Branch has exclusive authority and absolute discretion to decide whether to prosecute a case. United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974). "It follows

that you already have our May 19 and May 27 communications to the Deputy Attorney General, as well as our prior written submissions to CEOS and to the Southern District of Florida. In light of the significant volume of our prior submissions and to facilitate your review, we have drafted four supplemental submission

not be countenanced. That is all the more true under the circumstances where the duly appointed U.S. Attorney opined that, in effect, the "unitary" Executive Branch was driving this prosecution. We now know that is not so. What I respectfully request, and what I hope you will provide, is a truly "de novo" revie

orida, and the Defendant will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, prosecution in this District for these offenses shall be deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, provided that Epstein

ial actions is dri in th irony. We respectfully call your attention to the transcript of the interview with and guide you — as the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wi malting judgments consistent with our constitutional order — to the telling fact that Ms. Miler did not in any manner view herse

orida, and the Defendant will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of R. Alexander Acosta, United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, prosecution in this District for these offenses shall be deferred in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida, provided that Epstein

torial actions is dri in irony. We respectfully call your attention to the transcript of the interview with .nd guide you — as the duly confirmed Executive Branch official charged wi malting judgments consistent with our constitutional order — to the telling fact that Ms. did not in any manner view herself as