Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
fendant appears to have been hiding on a 156-acre property acquired in an all-cash purchase in December 2019 (through a carefully anonymized LLC) in Bradford, New Hampshire, an area to which she has no other known connections. The defendant appears to have no ties that would motivate her to remain in the
ings, and the Government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (Government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings). Where a judicial officer concludes after a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
fendant appears to have been hiding on a 156-acre property acquired in an all-cash purchase in December 2019 (through a carefully anonymized LLC) in Bradford, New Hampshire, an area to which she has no other known connections. The defendant appears to have no ties that would motivate her to remain in the
ings, and the Government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (Government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings). Where a judicial officer concludes after a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
fendant appears to have been hiding on a 156-acre property acquired in an all-cash purchase in December 2019 (through a carefully anonymized LLC) in Bradford, New Hampshire, an area to which she has no other known connections. The defendant appears to have no ties that would motivate her to remain in the
ings, and the Government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (Government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings). Where a judicial officer concludes after a
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
fendant appears to have been hiding on a 156-acre property acquired in an all-cash purchase in December 2019 (through a carefully anonymized LLC) in Bradford, New Hampshire, an area to which she has no other known connections. The defendant appears to have no ties that would motivate her to remain in the
ings, and the Government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (Government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings). Where a judicial officer concludes after a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
fendant appears to have been hiding on a 156-acre property acquired in an all-cash purchase in December 2019 (through a carefully anonymized LLC) in Bradford, New Hampshire, an area to which she has no other known connections. The defendant appears to have no ties that would motivate her to remain in the
ngs, and the Government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(f)(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (Government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings). Where a judicial officer concludes after a
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
fendant appears to have been hiding on a 156-acre property acquired in an all-cash purchase in December 2019 (through a carefully anonymized LLC) in Bradford, New Hampshire, an area to which she has no other known connections. The defendant appears to have no ties that would motivate her to remain in the
ings, and the Government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (Government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings). Where a judicial officer concludes after a
Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA00018509
ings, and the Government is entitled to present evidence by way of proffer, among other means. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(0(2); see also United States v. LaFontaine, 210 F.3d 125, 130-31 (2d Cir. 2000) (Government entitled to proceed by proffer in detention hearings). Where a judicial officer concludes after a
Page: EFTA00018509 →Page EFTA00018513
fendant appears to have been hiding on a 156-acre property acquired in an all-cash purchase in December 2019 (through a carefully anonymized LLC) in Bradford, New Hampshire, an area to which she has no other known connections. The defendant appears to have no ties that would motivate her to remain in the
Page: EFTA00018513 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (67)
Entities connected to both Bradford and LaFontaine
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON117 w/ Bradford·37 w/ LaFontaine
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON87 w/ Bradford·19 w/ LaFontaine
Prince Andrew
PERSON50 w/ Bradford·24 w/ LaFontaine
Michael Jackson
PERSON37 w/ Bradford·37 w/ LaFontaine
United States
LOCATION35 w/ Bradford·33 w/ LaFontaine
the Southern District
LOCATION32 w/ Bradford·30 w/ LaFontaine
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION30 w/ Bradford·24 w/ LaFontaine
Anderson
PERSON21 w/ Bradford·31 w/ LaFontaine
Julie K. Brown
PERSON31 w/ Bradford·16 w/ LaFontaine
New York
LOCATION28 w/ Bradford·15 w/ LaFontaine
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Bradford·31 w/ LaFontaine
United Kingdom
LOCATION29 w/ Bradford·13 w/ LaFontaine
CA
Casteneda
PERSON7 w/ Bradford·31 w/ LaFontaine
Ferranti
PERSON7 w/ Bradford·31 w/ LaFontaine
GL
Gleeson
PERSON7 w/ Bradford·31 w/ LaFontaine
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON10 w/ Bradford·27 w/ LaFontaine
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION8 w/ Bradford·29 w/ LaFontaine
Audrey Strauss
PERSON32 w/ Bradford·4 w/ LaFontaine
Michael Cohen
PERSON24 w/ Bradford·11 w/ LaFontaine
New York State
LOCATION4 w/ Bradford·30 w/ LaFontaine