Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (Tr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 ('Fr.). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sch
NTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 2 STATEMENT OF FACTS 3 I. The Underlying Offense 4 II. Sex Offender Registration 6 III. The Board's Recommendation 7 IV. Pre-Hearing Investigation By the District Attorney 11 V. SORA Hearing 12 ARGUMENT 16 I. THE COURT'S LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SU
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (Tr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 (Tr.). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sche
NTENTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 QUESTIONS PRESENTED STATEMENT OF FACTS 3 I. The Underlying Offense 4 II. Sex Offender Registration 6 III. The Board's Recommendation 7 IV. Pre-Hearing Investigation By the District Attorney 11 V. SORA Hearing 12 ARGUMENT 16 I. THE COURT'S LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SU
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (fr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 ('It). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sche
NTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 2 STATEMENT OF FACTS 3 I. The Underlying Offense 4 II. Sex Offender Registration 6 III. The Board's Recommendation 7 IV. Pre-Hearing Investigation By the District Attorney 11 V. SORA Hearing 12 ARGUMENT 16 I. THE COURT'S LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SU
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ry residence in New York. See A.88:21-24 (Tr.). Since May 2010, Appellant has been registered with the Sexual Offender Monitoring Unit (SOMU) of the New York Police Department. See A.88:21-89:3 (Tr.). III. The Board's Recommendation On or about August 26, 2010, Appellant received notice that a SORA hearing had been sche
NTS PRELIMINARY STATEMENT 1 QUESTIONS PRESENTED 2 STATEMENT OF FACTS 3 I. The Underlying Offense 4 II. Sex Offender Registration 6 III. The Board's Recommendation 7 IV. Pre-Hearing Investigation By the District Attorney 11 V. SORA Hearing 12 ARGUMENT 16 I. THE COURT'S LEVEL 3 DETERMINATION IS NOT SU
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (140)
Entities connected to both the New York Police Department and The Board's Recommendation
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON89 w/ the·4 w/ The
New York
LOCATION63 w/ the·4 w/ The
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION39 w/ the·4 w/ The
George W. Bush
PERSON39 w/ the·4 w/ The
Stephen Hawking
PERSON26 w/ the·2 w/ The
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON22 w/ the·4 w/ The
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON21 w/ the·4 w/ The
Melbourne
LOCATION20 w/ the·2 w/ The
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION16 w/ the·4 w/ The
Bill Richardson
PERSON15 w/ the·4 w/ The
New York City
LOCATION14 w/ the·4 w/ The
North Carolina
LOCATION13 w/ the·2 w/ The
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON9 w/ the·4 w/ The
Kentucky
LOCATION11 w/ the·2 w/ The
Brooks
PERSON9 w/ the·4 w/ The
Louisiana
LOCATION9 w/ the·2 w/ The
Legislature
ORGANIZATION7 w/ the·4 w/ The
Albany
LOCATION9 w/ the·2 w/ The
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON6 w/ the·4 w/ The
Adriana Ross
PERSON6 w/ the·4 w/ The