Epstein Secrets

13 EFTA00211730 'crime victim' means a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia."). The only provisions of the CVRA that even address state criminal proceedings are found in 18 U.S.C. § 3771(b)(2)—a provision that addresses col

ners during the investigation of Epstein are highly relevant in determining whether each petitioner can even invoke the CVRA. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr.

.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr. from Eisenberg to AUSA ; Ex. S, ¶¶ 6-12. Thus, she was unwilling to provide any information regarding her encounters with Epstein unless she was assured her state

numerated in article I.B, a victim is "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia" (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)), if the offense is charged in Federal district court. If a victim is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or

awsuits against Jeffrey Epstein. 13. During the course of the federal criminal investigation of Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2 was represented by attorney James Eisenberg, Esq., whose services were paid for by Epstein. Ex. S, ¶ 7. 14. Through her attorney, Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S.

guy and he didn't do nothing wrong, nothing. Id. at 58. 16. Several months after the videotaped interview of April 24, 2007, AUSA asked attorney Eisenberg whether she could contact Jane Doe No. 2 directly and was told that any contact with Jane Doe No. 2 had to occur via Mr. Eisenberg. Ex. S, ¶ 14. 17

numerated in article I.B, a victim is "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia" (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)), if the offense is charged in Federal district court. If a victim is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or

wsuits against Jeffrey Epstein. 13. During the course of the federal criminal investigation of Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2 was represented by attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq., whose services were paid for by Epstein. Ex. S, I 7. 14. Through her attorney, Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S.

guy and he didn't do nothing wrong, nothing. Id. at 58. 16. Several months after the videotaped interview of April 24, 2007, AUSA asked attorney Eisenberg whether she could contact Jane Doe No. 2 directly and was told that any contact with Jane Doe No. 2 had to occur via Mr. Eisenberg. Ex. S, ¶ 14. 17

numerated in article 1.B, a victim is "a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia" (18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)), if the offense is charged in Federal district court. If a victim is under 18 years of age, incompetent, incapacitated, or

awsuits against Jeffrey Epstein. 13. During the course of the federal criminal investigation of Epstein, Jane Doe No. 2 was represented by attorney James Eisenberg, Esq., whose services were paid for by Epstein. Ex. S, 1 7. 14. Through her attorney, Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S.

didn't do nothing wrong, nothing. Id. at 58. 16. Several months after the videotaped interview of April 24, 2007, AUSA Villafafia asked attorney Eisenberg whether she could contact Jane Doe No. 2 directly and was told that any contact with Jane Doe No. 2 had to occur via Mr. Eisenberg. Ex. S, 114. 17.

(2)(A) ("The term `crime victim' means a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia."). The only provisions of the CVRA that even address state criminal proceedings are found in 18 U.S.C. § 3771(b)(2)—a provision that addresses col

ners during the investigation of Epstein are highly relevant in determining whether each petitioner can even invoke the CVRA. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr.

.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Ltr. from Eisenberg to AUSA Villafafia; Ex. S, 6-12. Thus, she was unwilling to provide any information regarding her encounters with Epstein unless she was assured he

(2)(A) ("The term `crime victim' means a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia."). The only provisions of the CVRA that even address state criminal proceedings are found in 18 U.S.C. § 3771(b)(2)—a provision that addresses col

ners during the investigation of Epstein are highly relevant in determining whether each petitioner can even invoke the CVRA. Through her attorney, James Eisenberg, Esq.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Is. f

q.,' Jane Doe No. 2 refused to be interviewed by the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office unless she was granted immunity. Ex. A, Sept. 21, 2006 Is. from Eisenberg to AUSA Villafafia; Ex. S, ¶16-12. Thus, she was unwilling to provide any information regarding her encounters with Epstein unless she was assured h

states: -The term 'crime victim' means a person directly and proximately harmed as a result of the commission of a Federal offense or an offense in the District of Columbia." 18 U.S.C. § 3771(e)(2)(A). 5 The crime victim's complaint and the United States Attorney's answer—along with any accompanying discovery—would pr

stigative and prosecutorial arm of the executive branch of government." (quotation marks omitted)). Further, as we explained in ?a United States v. Eisenberg, "[u]ntil an indictment is returned and a case presented to the United States District Court, the responsibility for the functioning of the grand