Epstein Secrets

Attorney Acosta tried to eliminate a//concerns which, quite frankly, the SDFL was not obligated to address, let alone consider. In consultation with DAAG Mandelker, Mr. Acosta proposed the following language regarding the 2255 provision: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense

dictment. You are invited to evaluate whether I, along with U.S. Attorney Acosta, Criminal Division Chiefs Menchel and, later Robert Senior, Deputy Criminal Division Chiefs Lourie, followed by Rolando Garcia, and AUSA Villafana have somehow steered this investigation toward "an unprecedented extension of federal law"despite b

Attorney Acosta tried to eliminate a//concerns which, quite frankly, the SDFL was not obligated to address, let alone consider. In consultation with DAAG Mandelker, Mr. Acosta proposed the following language regarding the 2255 provision: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense

dictment. You are invited to evaluate whether I, along with U.S. Attorney Acosta, Criminal Division Chiefs Menchel and, later Robert Senior, Deputy Criminal Division Chiefs Lourie, followed by Rolando Garcia, and AUSA Villafana have somehow steered this investigation toward "an unprecedented extension of federal law"despite b

ted to the SDFL's intention to notify the victims pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3771. In response to Mr. Starr's concerns, USA Acosta again consulted with DAAG Mandelker who advised him to make the following proposal: "bode will defer to the discretion of the State Attorney regarding whether he wishes to provide vict

ee Tab G. You are invited to evaluate whether I, along with U.S. Attorney Acosta, Criminal Division Chiefs Menchel and, later Robert Senior, Deputy Criminal Division Chiefs Lourie, followed by Rolando Garcia, and AUSA Villafafla have somehow steered this investigation toward "an unprecedented extension of federal law"despite

Attorney Acosta tried to eliminate a//concerns which, quite frankly, the SDFL was not obligated to address, let alone consider. In consultation with DAAG Mandelker, Mr. Acosta proposed the following language regarding the 2255 provision: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense

dictment. You are invited to evaluate whether I, along with U.S. Attorney Acosta, Criminal Division Chiefs Menchel and, later Robert Senior, Deputy Criminal Division Chiefs Lourie, followed by Rolando Garcia, and AUSA Villafana have somehow steered this investigation toward "an unprecedented extension of federal taw"despite b

ttorney Acosta tried to eliminate all concerns which, quite frankly, the SDFL was not obligated to address, let alone consider. In consultation with DAAG Mandelker, Mr. Acosta proposed the following language regarding the 2255 provision: "Any person, who while a minor, was a victim of a violation of an offense

ee Tab G. You are invited to evaluate whether I, along with U.S. Attorney Acosta, Criminal Division Chiefs Menchel and, later Robert Senior, Deputy Criminal Division Chiefs Lourie, followed by Rolando Garcia, and AUSA Villafafla have somehow steered this investigation toward "an unprecedented extension of federal law"despite