Epstein Secrets

ms against me was because he disliked my insistence on pushing the case forward. After the NPA was signed, USA Acosta recommended that I transfer to the Civil Division. I agreed to meet with them and talk about their work. Despite USA Acosta's recommendation, I decided not to follow his recommendation, and I staye

of a federal case, but I don't recall discussing that at the time. 35 I had never before used a non-prosecution 34 As I noted in my filings in the Jane Doe' United States litigation, I had concerns about informing the victims that part of the negotiations involved securing for them the right to obtain d

ow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (1JSAO-SDFLA). 1 write to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligati

n the originals of both documents to me by November 9, 2010. With respect to the claims asserted in the litigation, in the Victim's Petition (DE I), Jane Doe # I brought claims against the United States for alleged violation of her rights under the Crime Victim's Rights Act ("CVRA"). The Jane Doe #1 petit

ow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (USAO-SDFLA). I write to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligatio

the originals of both documents to me by November 9, 2010. With respect to the claims asserted in the litigation, in the Victim's Petition (DE I ). Jane Doe # 1 brought claims against the United States for alleged violation of her rights under the Crime Victim's Rights Act ("CVRA"). The Jane Doe #1 petit

ow-up to your recent meeting concerning the above-referenced case, I write this letter in my capacity as the Electronic Discovery Coordinator within the Civil Division of the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (1JSAO-SDFLA). 1 write to advise you of the USAO-SDFLA's legal obligati

n the originals of both documents to me by November 9, 2010. With respect to the claims asserted in the litigation, in the Victim's Petition (DE I), Jane Doe # I brought claims against the United States for alleged violation of her rights under the Crime Victim's Rights Act ("CVRA"). The Jane Doe #1 petit

nguage that he proposed including in a revision to the NPA’s § 2255 implementation section. Mandelker forwarded the language to her counterpart in the Civil Division, who responded to Mandelker and Acosta that he did not have “any insight” to offer. On December 19, 2007, after Acosta and Sloman had a phone conv

victim denied being involved in, or being a victim of, criminal activity. Later, the victim obtained new counsel and joined the CVRA litigation as “Jane Doe #2.” 219 In his March 20, 2011 letter, addressed “To whom it may concern,” and published online in The Daily Beast, Acosta described “a year-lo