5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
d group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fact." The District Court found that
he Securities Act, or any other securities laws. Neither the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. Th
d group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fact." The District Court found that
he Securities Act, or any other securities laws. Neither the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. Th
d group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fact." The District Court found that
he Securities Act, or any other securities laws. Neither the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. Th
d group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fact." The District Court found that
he Securities Act, or any other securities laws. Neither the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. Th
d group liability purposes as engaging in a "trade or business" (the "2013 Sun Capital Case"). Further, in March 2016, the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts held that affiliated private equity funds investing in the same portfolio company may form a "partnership-in- fact." The District Court found that
he Securities Act, or any other securities laws. Neither the Access Fund nor the Underlying Fund will be registered as an investment company under the U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the "Investment Company Act"). Consequently, investors will not be afforded the protections of the Investment Company Act. Th
Entities connected to both the District of Massachusetts and the U.S. Investment Company Act

United States
LOCATION
United States District Court
ORGANIZATION
Puerto Rico
LOCATION
European Union
ORGANIZATION
Eric Holder
PERSONGlendower
LOCATION
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATION
Cayman Islands
LOCATIONU.S. Investment
ORGANIZATIONiCapital Advisors
ORGANIZATIONInvestment Concentration
ORGANIZATIONthe First Circuit
ORGANIZATIONThe Confidential Private Placement Memorandum
ORGANIZATION
United Kingdom
LOCATION
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSONCayman
LOCATION
Finland
LOCATION
Denmark
LOCATIONKeogh
ORGANIZATION