Epstein Secrets

vil Complaint attached hereto as Exhibit ar attorney Scott Rothstein aided by other lawyers and employees at the firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler, P.A., deliberately engaged in a pattern of racketeering that involved a staggering series of gravely serious obstructions of justice, actionable frauds,

e theory of the requestor's case, or to some significant aspect of the case); Ashemimry v. Ba Nafa, 847 So.2d 603 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). In addition, Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(3), does allow discovery of fact work product where the requesting party can show need and the inability to obtain the substantia

earing transcript before the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-BKC- RBR, in In re Rothstein Rosenfeld! Adler, P.A., in which the following were statements made by William Scherer, Razorback's counsel: • "[I]n November we filed a lawsuit in State Court and we al

ivilege log that this Court's predecessor, The Honorable David Crow, found to be insufficient on its face and not-compliant with the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5)7 and TIG Ins. Corp. v. Johnson, 799 So. 2d 339 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). Edwards has claimed that none of the documents on the dis

ction for lawful compliance with the provisions of s. 119.07. 4. The mediation is being conducted in both this action (In re Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A., U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Florida, Case No. 09-34791-RBR) and the State Court Action (Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Brad

participate in mediation subject to this Agreed Mediation Confidentiality Order. The Court, hereby ORDERS AND ADJUDGES as follows: I. Pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.720, Edwards, Epstein, and representatives from Fowler White and Farmer Jaffe who have the full authority to settle without EFTA0079591