Epstein Secrets

nt undermining the rights of a defendant in a criminal investigation "by conducting a de facto criminal investigation using nominally civil means." Sterling Nat'l Bank v. A-1 Hotels Int'l, 175 F. Supp. 2d 573, 579 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). EFTA00076651 The 'Rhodes' Case In the Rhodes case, the defendant Jason Rhodes, a h

t it contemplates his criminal prosecution." Kordel, 397 U.S. at 11-12 (emphasis added). In Kordel, a corporate executive was convicted of violating the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act partly on the basis of earlier answers to interrogatories served on his company by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in a ci

nt undermining the rights of a defendant in a criminal investigation "by conducting a de facto criminal investigation using nominally civil means." Sterling Nat'l Bank v. A-1 Hotels Intl, 175 F. Supp. 2d 573, 579 (S.D.N.Y. 2001). The `Rhodes' Case In the Rhodes case, the defendant Jason Rhodes, a hedge fund manage

it contemplates his criminal prosecution." Kordel, 397 U.S. at 11-12 (emphasis added). In Kordel, a corporate executive was convicted of violating the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act partly on the basis of earlier answers to interrogatories served on his company by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in a ci

nc., including but not limited to Marine Midland Bank Ac- count Nos. 018-78090-3, 018-78047-4, 018-78044-0, 018-78055-6, 018-78153-6, 018-78173-0, Sterling National Bank & That Company of New York Account Nos. 036-79716-07, 031-13410-01, 031- 43102-01, Republic National Bank for Savings Account No. 2601001775, and All Fun

ith their access to the drug. The Supreme Court rejected the patients' claims. The Court agreed with FDA that the new drug approval provisions of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act spe- cifically applied to the situation presented. (171 In one respect, however, the fact that Dr. Burzynski and his patients wer