Epstein Secrets

uments identified on his 159-page privilege log. In addition, Edwards' counsel suggested that Link & Rockenbach received the evidence from attorney William Scherer (Razorback's counsel). Although that is inaccurate, it demonstrates that any potential work-product protection has been waived by virtue of producti

. Hafele's stated interest in first allowing the Show Cause proceedings before The Honorable Raymond B. Ray, United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida, to occur before this Court proceeded with this review. With trial approaching on December 4, 2018, this Court instructed Epstein to file

nts could be in essence blackmailed into paying settlement that far exceeded the value of any legitimate damage claim. 20. Ft. Lauderdale attorney William Scherer represents multiple Rothstein related investors. He indicated in an article that RRA/Rothstein had used the "Epstein Ploy ... as a showpiece as bai

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. The United States in United States of America'. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer a

ants could be in essence blackmailed into paying settlement that far exceeded the value of any legitimate damage claim. 20. Ft. Lauderdale attomey William Scherer represents multiple Rothstein related investors. He Indicated in an article that RRA/Rothstein had used the "Epstein Ploy ... as a showpiece as bai

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 9. The United States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, has brought an action for Racketeering Conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) against Scott W. Rothstein who was the chief executive officer a