Epstein Secrets

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

inate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? ___ Yes No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? — Yes 1_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? — Yes No 9. Does this case originatefrom a matt

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

nate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 2003? Yes S. No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? Yes I_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No 9. Does this case originate from a ma

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

case originate from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to (1 1,,2003.> Yes S. No this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to 11, 1999? _ Yes 1_ No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? _ Yes — No Does this case originate from a matter pend

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with,ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August.of 2009, but became suspicious. H

te from a matter pending in the U.S. Attorneys Office prior to April 1, 2003? _ Yes —IL_ No 8. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the U. S. Attorney's Office prior to April 1, 1999? Yes .X___. No If yes, was it pending in the Central Region? Yes No 9. Does this case originate from a matte