Epstein Secrets

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

unt #: 1 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; * Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine Count #: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; • Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. Count #: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

nt 11: 1 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; * Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine Count #: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; • Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. Count #: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with,ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August.of 2009, but became suspicious. H

t ti: 1 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d); RICO Conspiracy; * Max.Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $250,000 fine Count, #: 2 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); Conspiracy to Commit Money Laundering; * Max,Penalty: 20 years imprisonment, $500,000 fine or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction. Count W: 3 18 U.S.C. § 1349