Epstein Secrets

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

orthern Region of the U.S. Attorneys Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes )C No 10. 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X_ No Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office p

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? — Yes X No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? — Yes __X— No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the V.S. Attorney's Of

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August of 2009, but became suspicious. H

the Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? _ Yes X No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? _ Yes __X__ No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's O

ertain of the named Defendants, which scheme directly impacted EPSTEIN as a named defendant in the Civil Actions. 19. Miami attorney and developer, Alan Sakowitz, was quoted in a November 2009 article as saying that he had met with,ROTHSTEIN as a potential investor in August.of 2009, but became suspicious. H

he Northern Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office prior to October 14, 2003? — Yes X._ No 10. Does this case originate from a matter pending In the Narcotics Section (Miami) prior to May 18, 2003? Yes _X— No 11. Does this case originate from a matter pending in the Central Region of the U.S. Attorney's Office