Epstein Secrets

supported with cause. See Dunkin Donuts, Inc. v. Mary’s Donuts, Inc., 206 F.R.D. 518, 522 (S.D.Fla. 2002), (allowing t

r deposition at the court ordered date and time. Jane Doe’s deposition proceeded from 11:11 a.m. until 6:05

y to demonstrate specifically how the objected- to information is unnecessary, unreasonable or otherwise unduly burdensome.”); Dunkin Donuts, Inc. v. Mary’s Donuts, Inc., 2001 WL 34079319 (S.D. Fla. 2001)(“the burden of showing that the requested information is not relevant to the issues in the case is on the party re

________________________/ OMNIBUS ORDER THIS CAUSE is before the Court on the following motions: (1) Defendant Epstein’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff Jane Doe 2 to Respond to Defendant’s First Request to Produce and to Overrule Objections and For an Award of Defendant’s Reasonable Expenses (D.E. #67); and (

5024 (S.D. Fla. 2005) and Dunkin Donuts, Inc. v. Mary’s Donuts, Inc., 2001 WL 34079319 (S.D. Fla. 2001), in which the

FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPS