Epstein Secrets

he parties. . . . In order for settlement talks to be effective, parties must feel uninhibited in their communications." Id. at 980. More recently, the Second Circuit has held that the transcript of a settlement conference was properly sealed, despite the "common law presumptive right of access to judicial documen

d permission to intervene, the press then filed their motion to unseal the court-filed settlement agreement,' and the motion was granted. See State Fann Fire and Cas. Co.. Hood, 2010 WL 3522445 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 2, 2010) ("State Farm II"). The district judge found that the settlement agreement was a "judi

the parties. . . . In order for settlement talks to be effective, parties must feel uninhibited in their communications." Id. at 980. More recently, the Second Circuit has held that the transcript of a settlement conference was properly sealed, despite the "common law presumptive right of access to judicial docume

nt 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 8 of 10 motion to unseal the court-filed settlement agreement,; and the motion was granted. See State Fann Fire and Cas. Co. v. Hood, 2010 WL 3522445 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 2, 2010) ("State Farm II"). The district judge found that the settlement agreement was a "ju

the parties. . . . In order for settlement talks to be effective, parties must feel uninhibited in their communications." Id. at 980. More recently, the Second Circuit has held that the transcript of a settlement conference was properly sealed, despite the "common law presumptive right of access to judicial docume

nt 386 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/22/2016 Page 8 of 10 motion to unseal the court-filed settlement agreement,; and the motion was granted. See State Fann Fire and Cas. Co... Hood, 2010 WL 3522445 (S.D. Miss. Sept. 2, 2010) ("State Farm II"). The district judge found that the settlement agreement was a "jud