Epstein Secrets

hat the district court (or Ms. Maxwell or Ms. M) unjustifiably delayed public access to the summary judgment papers. This is incorrect. In Lugosch the Second Circuit was understandably impatient with the district court's delay in acting on two newspapers' motion to intervene to unseal the summary judgment filing

hristine N. Walz ([email protected]) Madelaine J. Harrington ([email protected]) Sanford L. Bohrer ([email protected]) Andrew G. Celli ([email protected]) David Lebowitz ([email protected]) Jay M. Wolman ([email protected]) s/ Nicole Simmons 26 EFTA00791895

aneous: Respondent: Sharon Churcher; Jeffrey Epstein DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:15cv7433 OTHER DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:17mc00025 U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 17-01625 FILING DATE: 9/21/2015 JURISDICTION: Diversity JUDGE: Robert W. Sweet NATURE OF SUIT: 320 Assault, Libel & Slander FILING TYPE: Civil

Abady, LLP 600 Fifth Avenue 10th Floor New York, NY, USA 10020 (212) 763-5000 Fax: (212) 763-5001 Email:[email protected] FOR THE Intervenor Andrew G. Celli [LEAD ATTORNEY;ATTORNEY TO] Emery Celli Brinckerhoff & Abady, LLP 600 Fifth Avenue 10th Floor New York, NY, USA 10020 For internal use only SDNY

2nd Street New York, NY 10019 [email protected] Paul G. Cassell 383 S. University Street Salt Lake City, UT 84112 [email protected] Andrew G. Celli David Lebowitz Emery Celli Brinkerhoff & Abady LLP 600 Fifth Avenue at Rockefeller Center 10th Floor New York, NY 10020 [email protected] dle

otions for dismissal or summary judgment." Brown v. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 50 (2d Cir. 2019) (citing United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1049-50 (2d Cir. 1995) ("Amodeo II")); (b) any minimum presumption of public access is subject to many countervailing interests supporting continued sealing; and (c

cited with approval in SEC v. TheStreet.com, 273 F.3d 222, 232 (2d Cir. 2001), which was cited with approval in Brown, 929 F.3d at 51 n.40. Notably the Second Circuit in Brown held that redactions of sensitive, private information disclosed by witnesses in depositions because of "a strong expectation of continued