Epstein Secrets

Dershowitz; once when made by Michael Cemovich; and a third time when made by the Miami Herald), and because these issues are currently on appeal in the Second Circuit, Mr. Dershowitz asks that the Court immediately convene an in-person conference with counsel for all parties to discuss how to address this grave m

for over two years. But, because this Court has thrice denied applications for such disclosure (once when made by Mr. Dershowitz; once when made by Michael Cemovich; and a third time when made by the Miami Herald), and because these issues are currently on appeal in the Second Circuit, Mr. Dershowitz asks that

M. (15-cv-7433, Dkt. Nos. 439 (sealed), 892, 953.) A consolidated appeal from the orders denying the unsealing motions is currently pending before the Second Circuit. v. Maxwell, No. 18-2868 (2d Cir.). On March 6, 2019, the Court of Appeals heard argument on the consolidated appeal, which was widely covered in

ein, moved to unseal a limited portion of the record in order to clear his name. (15-cv-7433, Dkt. No. 364 at 1.) Alt-right activist and provocateur Michael Cemovich also sought to unseal the papers filed as part of Maxwell's motion for summary judgment, arguing, "Cemovich Media cannot conduct its Forth [sic] Es

20-2413 Loretta A. Preska, J. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 11th day of September, two thousand twent

slaine Maxwell, Defendant-Appellant. Sharon Churcher, Jeffrey Epstein, Respondents, Julie Brown, Miami Herald Media Company, Alan M. Dershowitz, Michael Cemovich, DBA Cemovich Media, Intervenors. It is hereby ORDERED that the United States shall submit an amicus letter brief, not to exceed ten (10) double-s

rotected by the Protective Order outweighs any public interest in their publication." (Id., at 9.) Messrs. Dershowitz and Cemovich both appealed to the Second Circuit. (ECF Nos. 500 and 915.) TheaAppeals are currently pending. On May 24, 2016, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a settlement agreement. Now, the

partially redacted, and the order denying the motion to unseal was itself sealed. The second individual, podcast host and investigative journalist Michael Cemovich, moved to intervene and unseal Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (the "Cemovich Motion"). (ECF No. 550.) The portion of the Cemovich motion se

20-2413 Loretta A. Preska, J. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 11th day of September, two thousand twent

slaine Maxwell, Defendant-Appellant. Sharon Churcher, Jeffrey Epstein, Respondents, Julie Brown, Miami Herald Media Company, Alan M. Dershowitz, Michael Cemovich, DBA Cemovich Media, Intervenors. It is hereby ORDERED that the United States shall submit an amicus letter brief, not to exceed ten (10) double-s

20-2413 Loretta A. Preska, J. United States Court of Appeals FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, in the City of New York, on the 11th day of September, two thousand twent

slaine Maxwell, Defendant-Appellant. Sharon Churcher, Jeffrey Epstein, Respondents, Julie Brown, Miami Herald Media Company, Alan M. Dershowitz, Michael Cemovich, DBA Cemovich Media, Intervenors. It is hereby ORDERED that the United States shall submit an amicus letter brief, not to exceed ten (10) double-s

OREMAN, P.C., 150 East 10th Avenue, Denver, CO 80203, By: Laura A. Menninger, Esq., Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, Esq., Ty Gee, Esq. Counsel for Intervenor Michael Cemovich: RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC, 100 Pearl Street, 14th Floor, Hartford, CT 06103, By: Jay M. Wolman, Esq. Counsel for Intervenor Alan Dershowitz: EMER

ep't of Justice, 312 F.3d 100, 106 (2d Cir. 2002), vacated and remanded, 541 U.S. 970, 124 S.Ct. 1874, 158 L.Ed.2d 464 (2004), aff'd, 380 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2004) (per curiam) (witnesses and third parties "possess strong privacy interests, because being identified as part of a law enforcement investigati