Epstein Secrets

r a portion of the deposition Mr. gave in the Maxwell case, which is troubling because it was subject to confidentiality in that case and, although the Second Circuit has ordered the unsealing of the summary judgment papers (which likely include references to Mr. deposition testimony), no mandate has issued or d

, we would provide it to you pursuant to subpoena. If you wish to discuss these matters, please do not hesitate to call. Best regards, Bob Lewis ROBERT Y. LEWIS Cell: I Direct Tel: www.freemanlewis.com FaX: EFTA00027375 --- PAGE BREAK --- ttps://vnin l wyers.cornin ew-yorIc/new-yorkfrobert-y- lewis-3

hat, in view of its importance. the tape was properly discoverable despite the claim of journalist privilege. The Daily News then took an appeal to the Second Circuit. While the appeal was pending, however, the underlying civil suit by Jane Does (as well as the other two girls) settled, leading to an automatic va

102(E) ORDER TO PRODUCE TAPE RECORDING x I Index No. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR CPLR 3102(E) ORDER TO PRODUCE TAPE RECORDING Robert Y. Lewis Freeman Lewis LLP 228 East 45th Street, 17th Floor New York. New York 10017 Tel: Fax: E-mail: Paul G. Cassell, Esq. (Motion for Pro Hac Vice A

ction by the Daily News of the recording. I attach the Rush declaration hereto as Ex. 3. 3 EFTA00728446 7. The Daily News then took an appeal to the Second Circuit. While the appeal was pending, however, the underlying civil suits by the three girls settled, leading to an automatic vacation of the district cou

e annexed Affidavit of Bradley James Edwards dated September 14, 2010, the Affidavit of Michael Fisten dated September 14, 2010, the Affirmation of Robert Y. Lewis dated September 15, 2010, the accompanying Memorandum of Law and all exhibits attached thereto, Bradley James Edwards, as defendant and counterclai

Id. This is unique and direct evidence of Epstein's lack of remorse that is not cumulative of anything else Edwards can present' 7 In its brief to the Second Circuit on the "Jane Doe" case, the Daily News claimed that Epstein's recording "shows little more than a defendant, charged in multiple actions with commit

should order the Daily News to produce the recording. New York, New York November I I, 2010 Respectfully submitted, Freeman Lewis LLP '4/i By: Robert Y. Lewis 228 East 45" Street, 17'h Floor New York, New York 10017 Tel: Fax: Paul G. Cassell (Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission Pending) (: " 4—'4 ;tel

nfidential source and his unpublished interview therefore fell within the federal qualified privilege that governs non-confidential news material in the Second Circuit. Dist. Ct. Op. at 4 (quoting Gonzales v. NBC, 194 F.3d 29, 36 (2d Cir. 1999)). Applying the federal qualified privilege standard (which is signific

sion to the Second Circuit. While the appeal was pending, the Jane Doe Action (as well as the ■. and E.W. suits) settled. See Moving Affirmation of Robert Y. Lewis, dated Sept. 15, 2010 ("Lewis Aff."), ¶ 7. The Daily News and Rush then moved the Second Circuit to vacate the District Court decision. 8 DWT 1511