Epstein Secrets

(d) 24 N.Y. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.8, cmt. [6A] 16 Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. amend. IV 22 U.S. CONST. amend. V 21 U.S. CoNST. amend. VI 26 iii EFTA00028932 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table of Exhibits EXHIBIT J: Notes of Feb. II, 2021 Call with AUSA (Sealed) EXHIBIT K: Hand

that 'implies the duty of establishing and maintaining civilized standards of procedure and evidence.'" United States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d 782, 789 (2d Cir. 1996) (quoting McNabb, 318 U.S. at 340). As the Supreme Court held in United States v. Payner, "Federal courts may use their supervisory power in s

Cir. 2019) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2). So, too, has Judge Preska redacted substantial material from the documents she has released on remand from the Second Circuit, again reflecting that Maxwell reasonably relied on the Protective Order. 20 EFTA00028953 --- PAGE BREAK --- reports were replete with misrepre

P. 5.2 19 M. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.3(d) 24 MI. Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 3.8, cmt. [6A] 16 Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. amend. IV 22 U.S. CONST. amend. V 21 U.S. CoNST. amend. VI 26 iii EFTA00029103 --- PAGE BREAK --- Table of Exhibits EXHIBIT J: Notes of Fe

that 'implies the duty of establishing and maintaining civilized standards of procedure and evidence.'" United States v. Ming He, 94 F.3d 782, 789 (2d Cir. 1996) (quoting McNabb, 318 U.S. at 340). As the Supreme Court held in United States v. Payner, "Federal courts may use their supervisory power in s

Cir. 2019) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2). So, too, has Judge Preska redacted substantial material from the documents she has released on remand from the Second Circuit, again reflecting that Maxwell reasonably relied on the Protective Order. 20 EFTA00029124 --- PAGE BREAK --- reports were replete with misrepre

e, 462 U.S. 696 (1983) 3 United States v. Thomas, 736 F.3d 54 (1st Cir. 2013) 6 ii EFTA00015305 --- PAGE BREAK --- Constitutional Provisions U.S. CONST. amend. IV passim U.S. CONST. amend. V passim iii EFTA00015306 --- PAGE BREAK --- Ghislaine Maxwell moves under the Fourth Amendment, Martinde

would raise constitutional issues, and that principles of fairness mandated enforcement of the protective order." Id. The government appealed, and the Second Circuit affirmed. The Second Circuit was blunt in explaining the government's missteps: The government may not ... simply by picking up the telephone or wr