Epstein Secrets

well settled. See, e.g., Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, 457 U.S. 596, 609 n.25 (1982); Hanford Courant Co. v. Pellegrino, 380 F.3d 83, 91 (2d Cir. 2004). EFTA00017095 --- PAGE BREAK --- filing, on August 28. See Dkt. 152. On August 29, the Government belatedly filed applications to seal bot

uildin and United States Courthouse White Plains, NY 10601 Re: United States v. Tartaglione, 16-cr-832 — Unsealing of Judicial Records Dear Judge Karas: I write on behalf of The New York Times Company and reporter Benjamin Weiser (jointly, "The Times") regarding the Government's application to seal

t makes them judicial documents. What's more, the weight of the common law presumption of access to these records is undeniably strong. In Graham, the Second Circuit found that the presumption of access for tapes played at a pretrial detention hearing was, at a minimum, "substantial": "The detention of criminal

transferred to Judge Rakoff for trial. 9/9/ 19 U.S. v. Sean Stewart, 15 Cr. 287 (JSR) (Enzer/Cooper) (USAO # 2015R001626): In the wake of a recent Second Circuit decision reversing the trial conviction of Sean Stewart, a former managing director at the investment banking firm Perella Weinberg Partners, for t

tanyl dealer before Judge Roman. (AUSAs Grossman/ Zverovich). 10/15/19 U.S. v. Latrell Murray (USAO # 2018R01403): Triggerlock trial before Judge Karas. (AUSA Coffman). 12/9/19 U.S. v. Justin Patterson (USAO # 2019R00265): Triggerlock trial before Judge Seibel. (AUSA Ligtenberg). 1/06/20 U.S. v.

uthern District of New York 300 Quarropas Street White Plains, NY 10601 Re: United States v. Nicholas Tartaglione, S4 16 Cr. 832 (KMK) Dear Judge Karas: I write to request that the Court promptly conduct an evidentiary hearing to ascertain the circumstances surrounding the Government's failure to p

that the government acted in bad faith. United States v. Greenburg, 835 F.3d 295, 303 (2d Cir. 2016); United States v. Rastelli, 870 F.2d 822, 833 (2d Cir. 1989). In other words, when the Government fails to preserve evidentiary material that is "potentially useful," such failure "does not violate due