3
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
5 / 3
Mentions
' The Government moves to file a redacted version this letter motion. The proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although this letter motion is a judicial document subject to the common law pr
al purporting to be that of the United States; any state, district, commonwealth, territory, or insular possession of the United States; the former Panama Canal Zone; the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; a political subdivision of any of these entities; or a department, agency, or officer of any entity n
proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although this letter motion is a judicial document subject to the common law presumption of access, the proposed redactions are narrowly tail
Page: EFTA00010105 →' The Government moves to file a redacted version this letter motion. The proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although this letter motion is a judicial document subject to the common law pr
Page: EFTA00010105 →al purporting to be that of the United States; any state, district, commonwealth, territory, or insular possession of the United States; the former Panama Canal Zone; the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; a political subdivision of any of these entities; or a department, agency, or officer of any entity n
Page: EFTA00010106 →proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although this letter motion is a judicial document subject to the common law presumption of access, the proposed redactions are narrowly tail
Page: EFTA00010111 →' The Government moves to file a redacted version this letter motion. The proposed redactions are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). Although this letter motion is a judicial document subject to the common law pr
Page: EFTA00010111 →al purporting to be that of the United States; any state, district, commonwealth, territory, or insular possession of the United States; the former Panama Canal Zone; the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands; a political subdivision of any of these entities; or a department, agency, or officer of any entity n
Page: EFTA00010112 →Entities connected to both Second Circuit and Panama Canal Zone

Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Alison J. Nathan
PERSON
Lugosch
PERSONPyramid Co.
ORGANIZATION
Damian Williams
PERSON
Weiland
PERSONJames P. McGee
PERSONNassau County
LOCATIONA.O. Smith Corp.
ORGANIZATIONSacramento County
LOCATIONthe Pacific Islands
LOCATIONthe Bureau of Vital Records
ORGANIZATIONthe Office of the Registrar
ORGANIZATIONBrewster Fire Dept
ORGANIZATIONthe Town of North Hempstead
LOCATIONS.D.N.Y. 2016
LOCATION