3
Shared Docs
0
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
legislature's authority to define an offense includes the power `to exclude elements of knowledge and diligence from its definition.'" Id. (quoting Lambert v. California , 355 U.S. 225, 228 (1957)). The Tenth Circuit also agreed with the legislative history, finding that the statute "protects children from sexual ab
Page: EFTA02857732_p5 →e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire". Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 1975). FI2 In 1946, the Supreme Court defin
Page: EFTA02857732_p7 →legislature's authority to define an offense includes the power `to exclude elements of knowledge and diligence from its definition.'" Id. (quoting Lambert v. California , 355 U.S. 225, 228 (1957)). The Tenth Circuit also agreed with the legislative history, finding that the statute "protects children from sexual ab
Page: EFTA02857763_p5 →e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire". Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 566 (5th Cir. 1975). Fl In 1946, the Supreme Court define
Page: EFTA02857763_p7 →legislature's authority to define an offense includes the power `to exclude elements of knowledge and diligence from its definition.'" Id. (quoting Lambert v. California , 355 U.S. 225, 228 (1957)). The Tenth Circuit also agreed with the legislative history, finding that the statute "protects children from sexual ab
Page: EFTA02857810_p5 →e activity was not "sexual enough" to qualify as "prostitution." Title 18 carries no definition of "prostitution." In United States v. Prince , the Fifth Circuit approved of the generic definition "sexual intercourse for hire" where the West Virginia statues also lacked a definition. Prince , 515 F.2d 564, 5
Page: EFTA02857810_p7 →Entities connected to both Fifth Circuit and Lambert v. California

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Marc Rich
PERSONLeon Black
PERSON
Alexander Acosta
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATIONEmmy Taylor
PERSONBonner v. City of
LOCATIONRoy Black
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
Jacksonville
LOCATION
New York
LOCATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATIONCriminal Division
ORGANIZATIONMySpace
ORGANIZATIONGerald Lefcourt
PERSON
Naomi Campbell
PERSON
Philadelphia
LOCATIONthe Ninth Circuit
ORGANIZATION