Epstein Secrets

ge 1 SMENEMININOIMI MSTLAIV Agency to Agency Requet: 19-411 SDNY_GM_00331585 EFTA_OO2O43 I I EFTA02729297 • IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 4D09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., E.W., and B.B., Respondents. Pe

tifies —his purported co-conspirators — were before the Court, they would have no privacy interest in matters pertaining to their criminal conduct. Post-Newsweek Stations. Florida. Inc. v. Doe, 612 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1992) (Does, whose names were implicated in criminal prostitution scheme, had no right to priv

e the public the reasonable impression of promiscuity. Ya think? or e-mall EFTA00183946 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DOCKETING STATEMENT AND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL (Revised as of May 1, 2001) The Court requires the following information in order to faci

ifies — his purported co-conspirators — were before the Court, they would have no privacy interest in matters pertaining to their criminal conduct. Post-Newsweek Stations, Florida, Inc.,. Doe, 612 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1992) (Does, whose names were implicated in criminal prostitution scheme, had no right to priva

009 15:22 FAX 5618059846 USAO WPB CONFRX 07-20-'09 14:21 FROM-THOMAS & LOCICERO 8139843070 T-113 P002/00Yjr-13Y IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 41)09-2554 JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner, VS. STATE OF FLORIDA, PALM BEACH NEWSPAPERS, INC., E.W., and B.B., Respondents. P

ifies — his purported co-conspirators — were before the Court, they would have no privacy interest in matters pertaining to their criminal conduct. Post-Newsweek Stations, Florida, Inc.'. Doe, 612 So. 2d 549 (Fla. 1992) (Does, whose names were implicated in criminal prostitution scheme, had no right to priva