Epstein Secrets

ose J. OLAGUES, on Behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; His- panic Coalition for Human Rights, Chi- nese for Affirmative Action, and San Francisco Lation Voter Registration Education Project, Plaintiffs-Appel- lants. Joseph P. RUSSONIELLO, individually and in his capacity es Untied States At

dge: Olagues, a citizen, and certain organiza- tions promoting the voting rights of Ameri- cans with Hispanic or Chinese ethnic back- grounds in the San Francisco Bay area (the organizations) sued for damages and de- claratory and injunctive relief arising from a preliminary investigation by the United States At

ppellees, U STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al., Defendants, Ken Ault, Defendant—Appellant. No. 81-5122 Non—Argument Calendar. United States Court of Appeals. Eleventh Circuit. April 14, 1989. Keith C. Tischler, Parker, Skelding, Cos- tigan, McVey & Labasky, Tallahassee, Fla., for defendant-appellant.

one girl le not shown. But On- 112 881 6. The quick appearance thereafter of Cindy at Scottsdale along with Judy straight from Ege's quarters in San Francisco' 7. Evidence that Boyd did make many calls to San Francisco from his motel late in September, 1953, and in October. 8. Boyd's subsequent admissi

1 209-1047 Fax 561 820-8777 1 EFTA00192258 Harold Lee BATIELL, Appellant, UNITED STATES of America, Appellee (two cases). Nos. 18945, 19344. United States Court of Appeals Eighth Circuit. Nov. 19, 1968. Certiorari Denied Feb. 24,1969. See 89 S.Ct 865. Prosecution for having persuaded, induced, enticed, and caused

istrict of California, according to the direction thereon." The exhibited letter plainly threatens injury to the addressee Joe Cohen, Elks Club, San Francisco, California, and evinces the manifest intent to extort mono' from the addressee. The order of the district court denying the motion of appellant

which at times seems to be forgotten." LIZZA AND SONS, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant, Daniel A. D'ONFRO et al., Defendants, Appellees. No. 5571. United States Court of Appeals First Circuit. Aug. 18, 1960. Action by general contractor against contractor and surety for breach of al- leged subcontract. The United States