Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
owledges that she could have, but did not, invoke her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed the protective order in that case would pre
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
owledges that she could have, but did not, invoke her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed the protective order in that case would pre
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
owledges that she could have, but did not, invoke her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed the protective order in that case would pre
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
owledges that she could have, but did not, invoke her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed the protective order in that case would pre
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
owledges that she could have, but did not, invoke her Fifth Amendment rights to avoid providing incriminating testimony. See, e.g., Pillsbury Co. v. Conboy, 459 U.S. 248, 263-24 & n.24 (1983). However, she contends that she testified only because she believed the protective order in that case would pre
e a sufficient, independent basis to modify a protective order under Martindell notwithstanding the parties' reasonable reliance on that order. See Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (citing Martindell, 594 F.2d at 296). Thus, even assuming that the Government shoul
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (40)
Entities connected to both Conboy and Minpeco S.A.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON14 w/ Conboy·7 w/ Minpeco
FI
Fisher
PERSON11 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON8 w/ Conboy·7 w/ Minpeco
United States
LOCATION10 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco
the Southern District
LOCATION8 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco
Julie K. Brown
PERSON6 w/ Conboy·6 w/ Minpeco
Second Circuit
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Conboy·7 w/ Minpeco
MA
Martindell
PERSON6 w/ Conboy·6 w/ Minpeco
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION6 w/ Conboy·6 w/ Minpeco
CS
Conticommodity Servs
PERSON5 w/ Conboy·6 w/ Minpeco
CM
Colleen McMahon
PERSON5 w/ Conboy·6 w/ Minpeco
PA
Payner
PERSON5 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco
ALISON J. NATHAN
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco
CA
Canfield
PERSON5 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco
SA
Salamelz
PERSON5 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco
Andover Data Servs
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco
the Second Circuit's
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco
OP
Orange Prod
PERSON5 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco
the Office of the U.S.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco
HJ
Harlan, J.
PERSON5 w/ Conboy·5 w/ Minpeco