Epstein Secrets

ee infra. Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of 4 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 559

intentional memorization." Tactica Intern., Inc. v. Atlantic Horizon Intern., Inc., 154 F.Supp.2d 586, 608 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); Standard Brands, Inc. v. Zumpe, 264 F.Supp. 254, 262 (D.La. 1967)(internal quotation marks omitted). See A.H. Emery Co. v. Marean Products Corp., 268 F.Supp. 289, 299 (S.D.N.Y. 1

Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before further disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials 2 Because of the relief sought in this Rule 4 Appeal, Epstein's civil lawyers have not obtained a cop

intentional memorization." Tactica Intern., Inc. v. Atlantic Horizon Intern., Inc., 154 F.Supp.2d 586, 608 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); Standard Brands, Inc. v. Zumpe, 264 F.Supp. 254, 262 (D.La. 1967)(internal quotation marks omitted). See A.H. Emery Co. v. Marean Products Corp., 268 F.Supp. 289,299 (S.D.N.Y. 19

Therefore, an in camera hearing should occur to determine what objections and privileges must be raised before further disclosure is made. U.S. v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 575 (1989)(disclosing materials to the district court does not have the legal effect of terminating a privilege thereby allowing par

intentional memorization." Tactica Intern., Inc. v. Atlantic Horizon Intern., Inc. 154 F.Supp.2d 586, 608 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); Standard Brands, Inc. v. Zumpe, 264 F.Supp. 254, 262 (D.La. 1967)(intemal quotation marks omitted). See A.H. Emery Co. v. Marcan Products Corp., 268 F.Supp. 289, 299 (S.D.N.Y. 19