Epstein Secrets

hrough a free-standing action for injunctive relief or in conjunction with a tort action for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty. See, M·, Saini v. International Game Technology, 434 F.Supp.2d 913, 924 (D.Nev. 2006)(court finds that company had shown likelihood of success in proving breach o

intentional memorization." Tactica Intern., Inc. v. Atlantic Horizon Intern., Inc., 154 F.Supp.2d 586, 608 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); Standard Brands, Inc. v. Zumpe, 264 F.Supp. 254, 262 (D.La. 1967)(internal quotation marks omitted). See A.H. Emery Co. v. Marean Products Corp., 268 F.Supp. 289, 299 (S.D.N.Y. 1

hrough a free-standing action for injunctive relief or in conjunction with a tort action for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty. See, M·, Saini v. International Game Technology, 434 F.Supp.2d 913, 924 (D.Nev. 2006)(court finds that company had shown likelihood of success in proving breach o

intentional memorization." Tactica Intern., Inc. v. Atlantic Horizon Intern., Inc., 154 F.Supp.2d 586, 608 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); Standard Brands, Inc. v. Zumpe, 264 F.Supp. 254, 262 (D.La. 1967)(internal quotation marks omitted). See A.H. Emery Co. v. Marean Products Corp., 268 F.Supp. 289,299 (S.D.N.Y. 19

ough a free-standing action for injunctive relief or in conjunction with a tort action for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty. agg, a g., Saini v. International Game Technology, 434 F.Supp.2d 913, 924 (D.Nev. 2006)(court finds that company had shown likelihood of success in proving breach o

intentional memorization." Tactica Intern., Inc. v. Atlantic Horizon Intern., Inc. 154 F.Supp.2d 586, 608 (S.D.N.Y. 2001); Standard Brands, Inc. v. Zumpe, 264 F.Supp. 254, 262 (D.La. 1967)(intemal quotation marks omitted). See A.H. Emery Co. v. Marcan Products Corp., 268 F.Supp. 289, 299 (S.D.N.Y. 19

ough a free-standing action for injunctive relief or in conjunction with a tort action for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty. See, e.g., Saini v. International Game Technology, 434 F.Supp.2d 913, 924 (D.Nev. 2006)(court finds that company had shown likelihood of success in proving breach o

third persons . . . in competition to the principal or to his injury, trade secrets or other similar confidential matters. Standard Brands, Inc. v. Zumpe, 264 F.Supp. 254, 262 (D.La. I 967)( internal quotation marks omitted). See A.N. Emery Co. v. Marcan Products Corp., 268 F.Supp. 289 (S.D.N.Y. 1967)