Epstein Secrets

is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed." Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 803 (1Ith Cir.1983). This right of access creates 'All documents filed conventionally shall henceforth be filed directly with the Off

us conduct would cause emotional trauma and damage to Jane Doe. 24. As a direct and proximate result of Epstein's intentional or reckless conduct, Jane Doe, has suffered and will continue to suffer severe mental anguish and pain. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Jane Doe No. 2 demands judgment against Defendant Jef

turned executed" as the proper Event. (Ik) (Entered: 05/27/2008) 05/29/2008 2 Plaintiffs MOTION for Entry of Default by Clerk Against Defendant by Jane Doc. (Attachments: #J, Exhibit A and B, #2 Text of Proposed Order Default Ord)(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 05/29/2008) 06/06/2008 8 CLERK'S NOTICE Denyi

criminal proceedings, see, e.g., Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 573 (1980), including pre-trial criminal proceedings. Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796 (11th Cir. 1983). Indeed, “the integrity of the judicial process, which public scrutiny is supposed to safeguard, is just as much at is

.powerful, politically connected money manager and simply refused to testify against him. In other cases, they said, the women changed their stories. Jane Doe 2, who is trying to have the non-prpsecution agreement thrown out, initially described Epstein as "an awesome man" arid told prosecutors she hoped “not

absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed.” Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 34 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/05/2008 Page 1 of 2 2 796, 803 (11th Cir.1983). This right of access c

ney cited in his brief. (Def. Mot. 2.) The Court is familiar with the U.S. Attorney’s objections to unsealing any part of the agreement, see In re: Jane Doe, No. 08-80736-CIV (S.D. Fla. July 11, 2008). However, as the Court has previously held, the U.S. Attorney’s objections do not outweigh the public in

iminal proceedings, see, e.g., Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 573 (1980), including pre-trial criminal proceedings. Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796 (11th Cir. 1983). Indeed, “the integrity of the NOT A CERTIFIED COPY 15 ACTIVE 696232185v3 judicial process, which public scruti

ue Epstein in civil court. As part of the agreement1 Epstein is to pay for Josefsberg to represent the women. Some of the women, most identified as Jane Doe in lawsuits, had already hired attorneys to represent them. Some have since settled their suits with Epstein, although terms were not disclosed.

ce and hence may have to be curtailed.” Newman v. Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 803 (11th Cir.1983). This right of

clusion by its decision in a similar case, In re: Jane Doe, No. 08-80736-CIV (S.D. Fla. July 11, 2008), in w

s is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed." Graddick, 696 F.2d 'The parties are reminded that all documents filed conventionally (including those filed under seal) must be filed with the Clerk's Offic

rney cited in his brief. (Def. Mot. 2.) The Court is familiar with the U.S. Attorney's objections to unsealing any part of the agreement, see In re: Jane Doe, No. 08-80736-CIV (S.D. Fla. July 11, 2008). However, as the Court has previously held, the U.S. Attorney's objections do not outweigh the public i

s is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed." Graddick, 696 F.2d 'The parties are reminded that all documents filed conventionally (including those filed under seal) must be filed with the Clerk's Offic

rney cited in his brief. (Def. Mot. 2.) The Court is familiar with the U.S. Attorney's objections to unsealing any part of the agreement, see In re: Jane Doe, No. 08-80736-CIV (S.D. Fla. July 11, 2008). However, as the Court has previously held, the U.S. Attorney's objections do not outweigh the public i

is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed." Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 803 (11th Cir.1983). This right of access creates 'All documents filed conventionally shall henceforth be filed directly with the Off

nt to justify keeping this document (filed ex parte) under seal. The Court is supported in this conclusion by its decision in a similar case, In re: Jane Doe, No. 08-80736-CIV (S.D. Fla. July 11, 2008), in which the Court unsealed, over the objection of the United States Attorney, documents containing si

is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed." Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 803 (11th Cir.1983). This right of access creates 'All documents filed conventionally shall henceforth be filed directly with the Off

nt to justify keeping this document (filed ex parte) under seal. The Court is supported in this conclusion by its decision in a similar case, In re: Jane Doe, No. 08-80736-CW (S.D. Fla. July 11, 2008), in which the Court unsealed, over the objection of the United States Attorney, documents containing sim

is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere with the administration of justice and hence may have to be curtailed." Graddick, 696 F.2d 796, 803 (11th Cir.1983). This right of access creates 'All documents filed conventionally shall henceforth be filed directly with the Off

tted willful acts of child sexual abuse on Jane Doe. These acts resulted in mental or sexual injury to Jane Doe, that caused or were likely to cause Jane Doe's mental or emotional health to be significantly impaired. 26. Epstein's conduct caused severe emotional distress to Jane Doe. Epstein knew or had