Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ny CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION at trial in this matter."). The parties could not have—as, for example, they might in a bankruptcy proceeding such as in Subpoena Duces Tecwn—relied upon the Protective Order to indefinitely keep the relevant materials hidden. In this case, where the Protective Order is limited by i
proceeding such as in Subpoena Duces Tecwn—relied upon the Protective Order to indefinitely keep the relevant materials hidden. In this case, where the Protective Order is limited by its terms to only the pretrial stages of the civil litigation, no confidential business information appears to be at issue, and counse
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ny CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION at trial in this matter."). The parties could not have—as, for example, they might in a bankruptcy proceeding such as in Subpoena Duces Tecwn—relied upon the Protective Order to indefinitely keep the relevant materials hidden. In this case, where the Protective Order is limited by i
proceeding such as in Subpoena Duces Tecwn—relied upon the Protective Order to indefinitely keep the relevant materials hidden. In this case, where the Protective Order is limited by its terms to only the pretrial stages of the civil litigation, no confidential business information appears to be at issue, and counse
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ny CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION at trial in this matter."). The parties could not have—as, for example, they might in a bankruptcy proceeding such as in Subpoena Duces Tecwn—relied upon the Protective Order to indefinitely keep the relevant materials hidden. In this case, where the Protective Order is limited by i
proceeding such as in Subpoena Duces Tecwn—relied upon the Protective Order to indefinitely keep the relevant materials hidden. In this case, where the Protective Order is limited by its terms to only the pretrial stages of the civil litigation, no confidential business information appears to be at issue, and counse
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (68)
Entities connected to both Subpoena Duces and the Protective Order
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON25 w/ Subpoena·46 w/ the
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON12 w/ Subpoena·27 w/ the
Alexander Acosta
PERSON7 w/ Subpoena·29 w/ the
United States
LOCATION17 w/ Subpoena·17 w/ the
the Southern District
LOCATION19 w/ Subpoena·13 w/ the
Kenneth Marra
PERSON4 w/ Subpoena·27 w/ the
RJ
Robert C. Josefsberg
PERSON2 w/ Subpoena·28 w/ the
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON18 w/ Subpoena·10 w/ the
A. Marie Villafana
PERSON5 w/ Subpoena·22 w/ the
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Subpoena·15 w/ the
Bradley Edwards
PERSON13 w/ Subpoena·13 w/ the
David Boies
PERSON18 w/ Subpoena·5 w/ the
SW
Sweet
PERSON17 w/ Subpoena·6 w/ the
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Subpoena·9 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON13 w/ Subpoena·9 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON13 w/ Subpoena·7 w/ the
FBI
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Subpoena·11 w/ the
Julie K. Brown
PERSON16 w/ Subpoena·3 w/ the
MA
Martindell
PERSON15 w/ Subpoena·4 w/ the
Prince Andrew
PERSON9 w/ Subpoena·8 w/ the