Epstein Secrets

ISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: C.M.A., 08-80811-Civ-ZLOCH/SNOW Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 21, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. DIST. CT. 5.0. OF FLA. MIAMI In accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446, and 1332(a)(1), the defendants, Jeffrey Epstein and 1 hereby

4; Jane Doe No. 4 at D.E. 1 ¶ 4; Jane Doe No. Sat D.E. 1 ¶ 4. 3. There is complete diversity. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require `complete diversity' of cit

04-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE #1, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. DISE. CI. 5.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI In accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446, and 1332(a)(1), the defendants, Jeffrey Epstein, and , he

sity jurisdiction. 2. There is complete diversity among the real parties to this controversy. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require `complete diversity' of cit

04-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: JANE DOE, a/k/a JANE DOE N1, Plaintiff, Vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN and Defendants. NOTICE OF REMOVAL July 18, 2008 STEVEN M. LARIMORE CLERK U.S. GIST. CT. S.D. OF FLA. • MIAMI In accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441, 1446, and 1332(a)(1), the defendants, Jeffrey Epstein, , and he

sity jurisdiction. 2. There is complete diversity among the real parties to this controversy. Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 185, 187 (1990) ("Since its enactment, we have interpreted the diversity statute to require `complete diversity' of cit