Epstein Secrets

directed at him in the case.” Id. Such concerns involving prejudice to a codefendant are not present here. In Securities and Exchange Comm’n v. Rehtorik, 755 F.Supp. 1018 (S.D. Fla. 1990), another case relied upon by Defendant, the Court denied a stay of the case, and made clear in its holding that t

emaining silent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.”2 Shell Oil, 866 F.Supp. at 540. Accordingly, the Defendant’s right to silence is not a basis to stay the civil case pending resolution of a criminal action.

directed at him in the case.” Id. Such concerns involving prejudice to a codefendant are not present here. In Securities and Exchange Comm’n v. Rehtorik, 755 F.Supp. 1018 (S.D. Fla. 1990), another case relied upon by Defendant, the Court denied a stay of the case, and made clear in its holding that t

emaining silent for fear of self incrimination in a parallel criminal proceeding does not rise to the level of an unconstitutional infringement.”2 Shell Oil, 866 F.Supp. at 540. Accordingly, the Defendant’s right to silence is not a basis to stay the civil case pending resolution of a criminal action.

ery directed at him in the case." Id. Such concerns involving prejudice to a codefendant are not present here. In Securities and Exchange Comm'n v. Rehtorik, 755 F.Supp. 1018 (S.D. Fla. 1990), another case relied upon by Defendant, the Court denied a stay of the case, and made clear in its holding that t

e Doe. 'In this regard, The Defendant's silence by invoking the Fifth Amendment does not prohibit adverse inferences against him in the civil case. Shell Oil. 866 F.Supp. at 40. - 3 - EFTA00201248 Case 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 64-3 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/24/2009 Page 4 of 13 Case 9:08-cv-80381

ery directed at him in the case." Id. Such concerns involving prejudice to a codefendant are not present here. In Securities and Exchange Comm' n'. Rehtorik, 755 F.Supp. 1018 (S.D. Fla. 1990), another case relied upon by Defendant, the Court denied a stay of the case, and made clear in its holding that t

e Doe. 'In this regard, The Defendant's silence by invoking the Fifth Amendment does not prohibit adverse inferences against him in the civil case. Shell Oil, 866 F.Supp. at 40. - 3 - EFTA00222588 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 82 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2009 Page 4 of 9 defendant's right aga