Epstein Secrets

eyenne, 451 F.3d 643, 668 (10th Cir. 2005) ("any work product protection was waived by [party] via production" of the documents in question); In re Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. Billing Practices Litigation, 293 F.3d 289, 302 (6th Cir. 2002) (attorney client/work product privilege was "never designed to protect conversation

ary. The United States Attorneys' office, at that juncture, was reviewing evidence relating to Epstein's sexual crimes against minor females within the Southern District of Florida and deliberating the filing of relevant federal charges; while Epstein's counsel clearly hoped to avoid any actual litigation between th

prosecutorial authorities investigating allegations against Epstein at that time, any work product protection was necessarily lost. See e.g. In re Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. Billing Practices Litigation, 293 F.3d 289 (6th Cir. 2002), cert. dismissed, 539 U.S. 977 (2003); In re Quest Communications International, Inc., 4

rsary. The United States Attorneys' office, at that juncture, was reviewing evidence relating to Epstein' sexual crimes against minor females within the Southern District of Florida and 6 EFTA00600059 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 7 of 11 deliberating the filing of rele

prosecutorial authorities investigating allegations against Epstein at that time, any work product protection was necessarily lost. See e.g. In re Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp. Billing Practices Litigation, 293 F.3d 289 (6ih Cir. 2002), cert. dismissed, 539 U.S. 977 (2003); In re Quest Communications International, Inc., 4

rsary. The United States Attorneys' office, at that juncture, was reviewing evidence relating to Epstein' sexual crimes against minor females within the Southern District of Florida and 6 EFTA00602812 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 7 of 11 deliberating the filing of rele