Back to Network
11
Shared Docs
11
Same-Page
11 / 11
Mentions
Document Mentions (11 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
—day after day, month after month, year after year. The defense calls these disturbing alleged acts "simple prostitution!' Mag. Tr. 12:12; see also D. Tr. at 6:15-19 ("This is basically the Feds today . . . redoing the same conduct that was investigated 10 years ago and calling it, instead of prostitu
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
—day after day, month after month, year after year. The defense calls these disturbing alleged acts "simple prostitution!' Mag. Tr. 12:12; see also D. Tr. at 6:15-19 ("This is basically the Feds today . . . redoing the same conduct that was investigated 10 years ago and calling it, instead of prostitu
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
—day after day, month after month, year after year. The defense calls these disturbing alleged acts "simple prostitution!' Mag. Tr. 12:12; see also D. Tr. at 6:15-19 ("This is basically the Feds today . . . redoing the same conduct that was investigated 10 years ago and calling it, instead of prostitu
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
—day after day, month after month, year after year. The defense calls these disturbing alleged acts "simple prostitution!' Mag. Tr. 12:12; see also D. Tr. at 6:15-19 ("This is basically the Feds today . . . redoing the same conduct that was investigated 10 years ago and calling it, instead of prostitu
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
—day after day, month after month, year after year. The defense calls these disturbing alleged acts "simple prostitution!' Mag. Tr. 12:12; see also D. Tr. at 6:15-19 ("This is basically the Feds today . . . redoing the same conduct that was investigated 10 years ago and calling it, instead of prostitu
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
—day after day, month after month, year after year. The defense calls these disturbing alleged acts "simple prostitution!' Mag. Tr. 12:12; see also D. Tr. at 6:15-19 ("This is basically the Feds today . . . redoing the same conduct that was investigated 10 years ago and calling it, instead of prostitu
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
—day after day, month after month, year after year. The defense calls these disturbing alleged acts "simple prostitution!' Mag. Tr. 12:12; see also D. Tr. at 6:15-19 ("This is basically the Feds today . . . redoing the same conduct that was investigated 10 years ago and calling it, instead of prostitu
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
—day after day, month after month, year after year. The defense calls these disturbing alleged acts "simple prostitution!' Mag. Tr. 12:12; see also D. Tr. at 6:15-19 ("This is basically the Feds today . . . redoing the same conduct that was investigated 10 years ago and calling it, instead of prostitu
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
—day after day, month after month, year after year. The defense calls these disturbing alleged acts "simple prostitution!' Mag. Tr. 12:12; see also D. Tr. at 6:15-19 ("This is basically the Feds today . . . redoing the same conduct that was investigated 10 years ago and calling it, instead of prostitu
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
e leader of a sex-trafficking enterprise, not a mere consumer. This analysis similarly extends to a non-prosecution agreement. See United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851, 854 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) ("Defendant's argument, in effect, is that unless there is an explicit statement to the contrary, it is pres
—day after day, month after month, year after year. The defense calls these disturbing alleged acts "simple prostitution!' Mag. Tr. 12:12; see also D. Tr. at 6:15-19 ("This is basically the Feds today . . . redoing the same conduct that was investigated 10 years ago and calling it, instead of prostitu
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (94)
Entities connected to both Laskow and D. Tr
AN
Annabi
PERSON35 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON35 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON32 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
Michael Jackson
PERSON32 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
Anderson
PERSON32 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
Reid Weingarten
PERSON32 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
Prince Andrew
PERSON32 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
United States
LOCATION32 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION30 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
the Southern District
LOCATION28 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION28 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
PR
Prisco
PERSON28 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
Harry Reid
PERSON27 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
Icarus
PERSON27 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
PI
Pitman
PERSON27 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
N.Y. Post
ORGANIZATION27 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
Amber Southerland
PERSON27 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
CA
Casteneda
PERSON27 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
Richard M. Berman
PERSON26 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION26 w/ Laskow·11 w/ D.