4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
nably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(eX3XE) (emphasis added); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). The Indictment in this case was returned by a grand jury thus establishing probable cause that the defendant c
o vanish upon any showing . . ., courts would be giving too little deference to Congress' findings regarding this class) (emphasis in original). • The U.S. Pretrial Services Department Recommends To The Court That Mr. Epstein Continue to Be Remanded The Pretrial Services report, dated July 8, 2019, concludes, following Pretrial Se
nably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(eX3XE) (emphasis added); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). The Indictment in this case was returned by a grand jury thus establishing probable cause that the defendant c
o vanish upon any showing . . ., courts would be giving too little deference to Congress' findings regarding this class) (emphasis in original). • The U.S. Pretrial Services Department Recommends To The Court That Mr. Epstein Continue to Be Remanded The Pretrial Services report, dated July 8, 2019, concludes, following Pretrial Se
nably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(eX3XE) (emphasis added); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). The Indictment in this case was returned by a grand jury thus establishing probable cause that the defendant c
o vanish upon any showing . . ., courts would be giving too little deference to Congress' findings regarding this class) (emphasis in original). • The U.S. Pretrial Services Department Recommends To The Court That Mr. Epstein Continue to Be Remanded The Pretrial Services report, dated July 8, 2019, concludes, following Pretrial Se
nably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(eX3XE) (emphasis added); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). The Indictment in this case was returned by a grand jury thus establishing probable cause that the defendant c
o vanish upon any showing . . ., courts would be giving too little deference to Congress' findings regarding this class) (emphasis in original). • The U.S. Pretrial Services Department Recommends To The Court That Mr. Epstein Continue to Be Remanded The Pretrial Services report, dated July 8, 2019, concludes, following Pretrial Se
Entities connected to both Martir and The U.S. Pretrial Services Department

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Contreras
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATIONthe Southern District
LOCATION
United Kingdom
LOCATION
Michael Jackson
PERSONLaFontaine
PERSON
New York State
LOCATION
Palm Beach
LOCATION
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION
George Mitchell
PERSON
Dominguez
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Amber Southerland
PERSON
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
David Mitchell
PERSONN.Y. App
ORGANIZATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSONValerio
PERSON