Back to Network
4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 4
Mentions
Document Mentions (4 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(eX3XE) (emphasis added); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). The Indictment in this case was returned by a grand jury thus establishing probable cause that the defendant c
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(eX3XE) (emphasis added); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). The Indictment in this case was returned by a grand jury thus establishing probable cause that the defendant c
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(eX3XE) (emphasis added); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). The Indictment in this case was returned by a grand jury thus establishing probable cause that the defendant c
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
nably assure the appearance of the person as required and the safety of the community." 18 U.S.C. § 3142(eX3XE) (emphasis added); United States v. Martir, 782 F.2d 1141, 1144 (2d Cir. 1986). The Indictment in this case was returned by a grand jury thus establishing probable cause that the defendant c
r importation into the United States (18 U.S.C. § 2260); Coercion and Enticement (18 U.S.C. § 2422); Transport of Minors (18 U.S.C. § 2423); Use of Interstate Facilities to Transmit Information About a Minor (18 U.S.C. § 2425). 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e)(3)(E). The presumption of remand does not disappear even when rebutte
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (88)
Entities connected to both Martir and Interstate Facilities
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON24 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
United States
LOCATION23 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
Contreras
PERSON20 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION18 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
the Southern District
LOCATION17 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
United Kingdom
LOCATION15 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
Michael Jackson
PERSON13 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
LA
LaFontaine
PERSON11 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
New York State
LOCATION11 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
Palm Beach
LOCATION11 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION10 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
George Mitchell
PERSON10 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
Dominguez
PERSON9 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
New York
LOCATION9 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
Amber Southerland
PERSON9 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION9 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
David Mitchell
PERSON8 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
N.Y. App
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
Bradley Edwards
PERSON7 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate
VA
Valerio
PERSON7 w/ Martir·4 w/ Interstate