6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
on an alternative basis, this court dismiss this action Sua Sponte until such time as C.M.A. identifies herself in the style of this matter. Doe v. Rostker, 89 F.R.D at 163." 3. Plaintiff withdraws her objection to a) and b) requested above. The request to have C.M.A.'s case dismissed is rendered moo
Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 108 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/20/2009 Page 1 of 6 JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
on an alternative basis, this court dismiss this action Sua Sponte until such time as C.M.A. identifies herself in the style of this matter. Doe v. Rostker, 89 F.R.D at 163." 3. Plaintiff withdraws her objection to a) and b) requested above. The request to have C.M.A.'s case dismissed is rendered moo
, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON ___________ / JANE DOE NO. 3 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5 Plaintiff, vs.
y suffer some personal embarrassment, standing alone, does not require the granting of a request to proceed under a pseudonym." Id; see also Doe v. Rostker, 89 F.R.D. 159 (N.D. Calif. 1981). Any substantial privacy interests JANE DOE has must outweigh the customary and constitutionally embedded presum
CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA-JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, V. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. I ------------- MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THE STYLE OF THIS CASE AND MOTION TO IDENTIFY JANE DOE IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, OR ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO DISMISS
an alternative basis, this court dismiss this action Sua Sponte until such time as JANE DOE identifies herself in the style of this matter. Doe v. Rostker, 89 F.R.D.at 163. WHEREFORE, Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this Court enter said order granting the relief requested above,
ury and justice shall be administered without sale, denial or delay. Art. I, §21, Fla. Const.; 10A Fla. Jur. 2d, Constitutional Law, §360. 16. If Jane Doe's name is not disclosed and identified, Mr. Epstein will not be afforded his fundamental right to fairly litigate this dispute and prepare for trial.
an alternative basis, this court dismiss this action Sua Sponte until such time as JANE DOE identifies herself in the style of this matter. Doe v. Rostker, 89 F.R.D.at 163. WHEREFORE, Epstein, Jeffrey Epstein, respectfully requests that this Court enter said order granting the relief requested above,
ury and justice shall be administered without sale, denial or delay. Art. I, §21, Fla. Const.; 10A Fla. Jur. 2d, Constitutional Law, §360. 15. If Jane Doe's name is not disclosed and identified, Mr. Epstein will not be afforded his fundamental right to fairly litigate this dispute and prepare for trial.
y suffer some personal embarrassment, standing alone, does not require the granting of a request to proceed under a pseudonym." Id; see also Doe v, Rostker, 89 F.R.D. 159 (N.D. Calif. 1981). Any substantial privacy interests JANE DOE has must outweigh the customary and constitutionally embedded presump
ould ultimately result in reversible error at any trial. II. Conclusion and Prayer for Relief 22. Epstein requests the following relief: a. That JANE DOE's Motion to Proceed Anonymously be denied; b. That this Court grant Epstein's Motion and that JANE DOE be identified by her legal name in the style
Entities connected to both Rostker and Jane Doe

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Kenneth Marra
PERSONJack Goldberger
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Adam D. Horowitz
PERSONMichael J. Pike
PERSONJack Scarola
PERSONRichard Horace Willits
PERSONJack Patrick Hill
PERSONStuart S. Mermelstein
PERSONMermelstein & Horowitz
ORGANIZATIONAtterbury Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATIONBruce E. Reinhart
PERSON
Lake Worth
LOCATION
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley
ORGANIZATION
George Mitchell
PERSONEmmy Taylor
PERSONBurman Critton Luttier & Coleman LLP
ORGANIZATIONFederal Court
ORGANIZATIONAtterbury, Goldberger & Weiss
ORGANIZATION