Document DOJ-DOE6-80994-052 is a legal document filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida.
This document contains multiple case filings against Jeffrey Epstein, primarily involving Jane Does and C.M.A. The document includes notices of withdrawal of objections to motions filed by Jeffrey Epstein related to identifying C.M.A. for discovery purposes, or alternatively, motions to dismiss. Several case numbers are listed, indicating multiple plaintiffs and legal actions against Epstein.

Perversion of Justice
Julie K. Brown
Investigative journalism that broke the case open

Filthy Rich
James Patterson
Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes

Glenn M. Anderson, Lyle Cook, Jack Goldberger, et al., Appellants, v. Frank M. Jordan, as Secretary of State of the State of California. U.S. Supreme ... of Record with Supporting Pleadings
Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/20/2009
Page 1 of 6 JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON ___________ / JANE DOE NO. 3 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON I CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON I CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON I Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/20/2009
Page 2 of 6 JANE DOE NO. 6 Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 7 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. C.M.A. Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON I CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-MARRA/JOHNSON I CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON I CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON I 2 Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/20/2009
Page 3 of 6 DOE II Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________ / JANE DOE NO. 101 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ___________ / JANE DOE NO. 102 Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________ / CASE NO.: 09-CV-80469-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON PLAINTIFF'S NOTICE OF FILING WITHDRAWAL OF PREVIOUSLY RAISED OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT, JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S, MOTION TO COMPEL AND/OR IDENTIFY C.M.A. IN THE STYLE OF THIS CASE AND MOTION TO IDENTIFY C.M.A. IN THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS FOR PURPOSES OF DISCOVERY, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, MOTION TO DISMISS SUA SPONTE, WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff, C.M.A., by and through her undersigned attorneys, hereby files notice of withdrawal of previously raised objections to Defendant, JEFRREY EPSTEIN'S, Motion 3 Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/20/2009
Page 4 of 6 to Compel and/or Identify C. M.A. in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identify C. M.A. in Third-Party Subpoenas For Purposes of Discovery, or, Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte, With Incorporated Memorandum of Law, and further states as follows: 1. Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, filed a Motion to Compel and/or Identify C. M.A. in the Style of This Case and Motion to Identify C. M.A. in Third-Party Subpoenas For Purposes of Discovery, or, Alternatively, Motion to Dismiss Sua Sponte, With Incorporated Memorandum of Law (D.E. 67) on April 29, 2009. 2. EPSTEIN's Motion seeks the following relief (taken verbatim from the conclusion of his Motion): a) "That C.M.A. be identified by her legal name in the style of this case; b) That Epstein be granted leave to identify C.M.A. by her legal name in Third-Party Subpoenas (but not file them in Court, or, if required, in a redacted form); and c) That on an alternative basis, this court dismiss this action Sua Sponte until such time as C.M.A. identifies herself in the style of this matter. Doe v. Rostker, 89 F.R.D at 163." 3. Plaintiff withdraws her objection to a) and b) requested above. The request to have C.M.A.'s case dismissed is rendered moot given C.M.A.'s acquiescence to a) and b). To the extent that it is not, however, C.M.A. continues to object to c) above. 4 Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/20/2009
Page 5 of 6 4. Counsel for EPSTEIN is free to prepare a proposed agreed order reflecting the above for the Court's consideration following the undersigned's review of same. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1 Counsel for the movant conferred via telephone with counsel for the Defendant regarding the filing of the instance Notice and he has no objection to Plaintiff filing same. s/ Jack P. Hill CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 20th day of May, 2009, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using CM/ECF system, which will send a notice of electronic filing to all counsel of record on the attached service list. /sf.Jack P Hill Jack Scarola Florida Bar No.: 169440 Jack P. Hill Florida Bar No.: 0547808 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, Florida 33409 Phone: (561) 686-6300 Fax: (561) 383-9424 Attorneys for Plaintiff, C.M.A. 5 Case 9:08-cv-80994-KAM Document 52 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/20/2009


