Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00776366

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

76, and that was a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal, and I will quote headnote 3, "had the Petitioners brought their lawsuit against Ruzzo and the Board Room only under Section 769.09, evidence of Petitioner's past prostitution 8 including with the Board Room and their earnings 9 r

ourt they sit, is going to be entitled to a fair shake and a fair trial and entitled to the EFTA00776411 47 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 the Ballast vs. Ruzzo case. For the record, the citation is 703 So.2d. 1076, and that was a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal, and I will quote headnote 3,

lly speaks to 24 that at length where the cause of action was 25 delineated and discussed fully - I think goes EFTA00776413 49 1 back to the McCarson case and then its prodigy, 2 but to prove a claim for intentional infliction 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Court that, within the bounds of reasonablen

EFTA00234224

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

e, prostitutes who sued a house of prostitution (as an "enterprise") for inflicting systematic and repetitive abuse on them, over time. See Baku v. Ruzzo, 703 So. 2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (offering an example of a civil RICO claim against the operators of an alleged "house of prostitution,"

f mental suffering; (2) outrageous conduct; (3) the conduct caused the emotional distress; and (4) the distress was severe. Metro. Life Ins. Co. v. McCarson, 467 So. 2d 277, 278 (Fla. 1985). Whether conduct is outrageous enough to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress is a ques

EFTA00230786_sub_003 - EFTA00230786_300

2 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

, prostitutes who sued a house of prostitution (as an "enterprise") for inflicting systematic and repetitive abuse on them, over time. See Bala: v. Ruzzo, 703 So. 2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997) (offering an example of a civil RICO claim against the operators of an alleged "house of prostitution,"