Epstein Secrets

3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); In re Agent Orange Products Liability Litigation, 821 F.2d 139, 145 (2d Cir. 1987); 19th Street Baptist Church v. St. Peters Episcopal Church, 190 F.R.D. 345,348 (E.D. Penn. 2000). The Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to satisfy their burden of demonstrating good cause for a protec

Entered on FLSD Docket 09/15/2009 Page 1 of 5 JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); In re Agent Orange Products Liability Litigation, 821 F.2d 139, 145 (2d Cir. 1987); 19th Street Baptist Church v. St. Peters Episcopal Church 190 F.R.D. 345, 348 (E.D. Penn. 2000). The Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to satisfy their burden of demonstrating good cause for a protec

OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend

3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002); In re /went Orange Products Liability Litigation, 821 F.2d 139, 145 (2d Cir. 1987); 19th Street Baptist Church v. St. Peters Episcopal Church 190 F.R.D. 345, 348 (E.D. Penn. 2000). The Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to satisfy their burden of demonstrating good cause for a protec

OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-CIV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE NO. 2, Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defend