Epstein Secrets

ether the Fifth Amendment privilege is validly asserted in response to particular questions. This issue is typically resolved on a motion to compel. Custer Battles 415 F. Supp. 2d at 633. If it is determined that the privilege is properly asserted, then adverse inferences are admissible consistent with

tz -15- EFTA00728215 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/02/2009 Page 16 of 16 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger Es . Robert D. Critton, Esq. s/ Adam D. Horowitz -16- EFTA00728216 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM D

ether the Fifth Amendment privilege is validly asserted in response to particular questions. This issue is typically resolved on a motion to compel. Custer Battles 415 F. Supp. 2d at 633. If it is determined that the privilege is properly asserted, then adverse inferences are admissible consistent with

tz -15- EFTA00222516 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 57 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/02/2009 Page 16 of 16 SERVICE LIST DOE vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldber er, Es . Robert D. Critton, Esq. s/ Adam D. Horowitz -16- EFTA00222517

se liberal discovery rules, and 'undermine[s] to some degree the trial system's capacity to ascertain the truth." United States ex rel. DRC, Inc. v. Custer Battles, LLC, 415 F.Supp.2d 628, 632 (E.D. Va. 2006) (quoting Robert Heidt, The 8 EFTA00234878 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 165 Entered on

9-KAM Document 165 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/19/2009 Page 21 of 41 CASE NO: 08-CV-80119-MARRAJJOHNSON SERVICE LIST Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein United States District Court, Southern District of Florida Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq. k)Idberger aewpa.com Robert D. Critton, Esq. rcritton(&.bciclaw.com Isidro Manual Garci