Epstein Secrets

is otherwise fully advised in the premises. It is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Epstein’s Motion to Continue (DE 104) is DENIED as to Plaintiffs C.M.A and Jane Doe (80893). After reviewing the parties’ submissions and the record, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion to continue is premature. Th

_________/ C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-80811-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. ____________________________________/ JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08- 80893-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN et al, Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 187 Entered on FLSD Docke

ion until May 25, 2009, for Plaintiff to file a response to Defendant's Motion to Identify C.M.A. 3. Defendant's motion seeks to publicly identify C.M.A, a victim of Defendant's sexual abuse. 4. The undersigned has been busy researching and drafting responsive memorandums in opposition to disposit

Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 101 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/15/2009 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. -----------' JANE DOE NO. 3 Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. -------------'' J

EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO REPLY TO PLAINTIFF C.M.A'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION T

ff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. -----------·' JANE DOE NO. 7, Plaintiff, JEFFREY EPSTEIN Defendant.